IWL vs. MEME
IWL (iShares Russell Top 200 ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. IWL is passively managed, while MEME is actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.
Performance
IWL vs. MEME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWL achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 79.03% return.
IWL
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 10.03%
- 6M
- 10.03%
- 1Y
- 28.50%
- 3Y*
- 23.42%
- 5Y*
- 14.59%
- 10Y*
- 16.38%
MEME
- 1D
- -5.29%
- 1M
- 25.28%
- YTD
- 79.03%
- 6M
- 68.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWL vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF | 10.03% | 1.89% |
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 79.03% | -36.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWL and MEME is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.56 |
IWL vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWL
MEME
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
IWL
MEME
Communication Services
IWL
MEME
Financial Services
IWL
MEME
Consumer Cyclical
IWL
MEME
-
Healthcare
IWL
MEME
Industrials
IWL
MEME
Consumer Defensive
IWL
MEME
-
Energy
IWL
MEME
Utilities
IWL
MEME
Basic Materials
IWL
MEME
Real Estate
IWL
MEME
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWL vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank
IWL
MEME
IWL vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWL | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.35 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.20 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.92 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWL | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.28 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
IWL vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWL drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWL and MEME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWL | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.71% | -48.78% | +16.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -5.93% | +5.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.88% | -29.90% | +26.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | — | — |
Volatility
IWL vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWL | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.19% | 74.19% | -62.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 74.19% | -57.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 74.19% | -56.11% |
IWL vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWL vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison
IWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF | 0.82% | 0.90% | 1.04% | 1.30% | 1.54% | 1.12% | 1.30% | 1.96% | 1.93% | 1.69% | 1.96% | 2.14% |
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWL and MEME have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.
IWL has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IWL and 0.69% for MEME.
Find the right allocation for IWL and MEME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer