IWL vs. DRUP
IWL (iShares Russell Top 200 ETF) and DRUP (GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - IWL tracks the Russell Top 200 Index while DRUP tracks the Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWL returned 14.59%/yr vs 10.93%/yr for DRUP. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DRUP.
Performance
IWL vs. DRUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWL achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly higher than DRUP's -3.24% return.
IWL
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 10.03%
- 6M
- 10.03%
- 1Y
- 28.50%
- 3Y*
- 23.42%
- 5Y*
- 14.59%
- 10Y*
- 16.38%
DRUP
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -4.85%
- 1Y
- 8.51%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- —
IWL vs. DRUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF | 10.03% | 19.09% | 27.12% | 29.77% | -19.89% | 27.79% | 22.10% | 10.74% |
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF | -3.24% | 18.18% | 23.11% | 42.32% | -28.18% | 26.13% | 28.71% | 11.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWL and DRUP is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2019 | 0.90 |
The correlation between IWL and DRUP shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWL vs. DRUP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWL
DRUP
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
IWL
DRUP
Communication Services
IWL
DRUP
Financial Services
IWL
DRUP
Consumer Cyclical
IWL
DRUP
Healthcare
IWL
DRUP
Industrials
IWL
DRUP
Consumer Defensive
IWL
DRUP
-
Energy
IWL
DRUP
-
Utilities
IWL
DRUP
-
Basic Materials
IWL
DRUP
-
Real Estate
IWL
DRUP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWL vs. DRUP — Risk / Return Rank
IWL
DRUP
IWL vs. DRUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWL | DRUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.35 | 0.44 | +1.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.20 | 0.72 | +2.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.09 | +0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 0.37 | +2.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.92 | 0.92 | +12.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWL | DRUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 0.44 | +1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.50 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.67 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
IWL vs. DRUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWL drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, roughly equal to the maximum DRUP drawdown of -31.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWL and DRUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWL | DRUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.71% | -31.29% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.83% | -23.21% | +13.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.15% | -23.77% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.65% | -31.29% | +5.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -6.09% | +5.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.88% | -8.41% | +4.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 9.25% | -7.04% |
Volatility
IWL vs. DRUP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) is 2.98%, while GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that IWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWL | DRUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 7.48% | -4.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | 16.17% | -7.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.19% | 19.55% | -7.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 21.78% | -4.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 23.23% | -5.15% |
IWL vs. DRUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DRUP's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWL vs. DRUP - Dividend Comparison
IWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while DRUP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.53% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF | 0.82% | 0.90% | 1.04% | 1.30% | 1.54% | 1.12% | 1.30% | 1.96% | 1.93% | 1.69% | 1.96% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWL and DRUP have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRUP has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to IWL (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWL dropped -32.71% vs DRUP's -31.29%.
On 5-year performance, IWL leads with 14.59% vs 10.93% for DRUP. On fees, IWL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IWL has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IWL has performed better with a 14.59% return vs 10.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DRUP.
IWL has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for DRUP.
IWL tracks Russell Top 200 Index, while DRUP tracks Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: iShares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IWL and 0.60% for DRUP.
IWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWL and DRUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer