IWFH vs. GXPT

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

IWFH (iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF) and GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IWFH tracks the NYSE FactSet Global Virtual Work and Life Index while GXPT tracks the MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. IWFH charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPT.

Performance

IWFH vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IWFH

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GXPT

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: -4.28%
• YTD: 14.23%
• 6M: 12.57%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFH vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF	0.00%	0.00%
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF	14.23%	11.47%

Return for Risk

IWFH vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IWFH	GXPT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-18.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-10.77%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IWFH	GXPT	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	22.83%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	22.83%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	22.83%	—

IWFH vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFH has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWFH vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison

IWFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF	0.12%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%	1.83%	0.31%	0.00%	0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, IWFH or GXPT?

On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWFH or GXPT?

GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IWFH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWFH or GXPT?

GXPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for IWFH.

What is the main difference between IWFH and GXPT?

IWFH tracks NYSE FactSet Global Virtual Work and Life Index, while GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IWFH and 0.15% for GXPT.