IWFH vs. PSI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI).

IWFH and PSI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWFH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NYSE FactSet Global Virtual Work and Life Index. It was launched on Sep 29, 2020. PSI is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. It was launched on Jun 23, 2005. Both IWFH and PSI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IWFH vs. PSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IWFH vs. PSI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-7.41%	17.42%	-39.32%	-25.56%	15.64%
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF	23.10%	36.32%	17.17%	49.06%	-34.43%	46.55%	31.99%

Returns By Period

IWFH

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PSI

• 1D: 2.85%
• 1M: -3.70%
• YTD: 23.10%
• 6M: 35.45%
• 1Y: 103.61%
• 3Y*: 33.33%
• 5Y*: 18.56%
• 10Y*: 27.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFH vs. PSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFH has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than PSI's 0.56% expense ratio.

PSI

Invesco Semiconductors ETF

IWFH

iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF

Return for Risk

IWFH vs. PSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSI

PSI Risk / Return Rank: 95
PSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
PSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
PSI Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PSI Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFH vs. PSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IWFH	PSI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.51	—

Correlation

The correlation between IWFH and PSI is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

IWFH vs. PSI - Dividend Comparison

IWFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%	1.83%	0.31%	0.00%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF	0.08%	0.10%	0.15%	0.40%	0.61%	0.14%	0.21%	0.52%	0.83%	0.21%	0.68%	0.16%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IWFH	PSI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-62.96%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.67%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-7.31%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-16.05%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.17%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IWFH	PSI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	15.33%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	29.78%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	43.67%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	37.34%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	34.67%	—