IWFH vs. AIS

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

IWFH (iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF) and AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. IWFH is passively managed, while AIS is actively managed. IWFH charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AIS.

Performance

IWFH vs. AIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IWFH

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AIS

• 1D: -4.96%
• 1M: 5.37%
• YTD: 111.33%
• 6M: 109.47%
• 1Y: 185.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFH vs. AIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	111.33%	58.35%	-4.74%

IWFH vs. AIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWFH	AIS
Technology	43.2%	88.5%
Communication Services	31.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	-
Healthcare	9.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-0.0%
Industrials	-	7.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	2.6%

Return for Risk

IWFH vs. AIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWFH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AIS

AIS Risk / Return Rank: 96
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 94
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFH vs. AIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWFH	AIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	4.43	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.18	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.60	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	11.75	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	35.48	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IWFH	AIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-32.78%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-9.72%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.50%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.24%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IWFH	AIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	23.79%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.87%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	42.00%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	41.30%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	41.30%	—

IWFH vs. AIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFH has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than AIS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWFH vs. AIS - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWFH nor AIS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%	1.83%	0.31%	0.00%	0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, IWFH or AIS?

On fees, IWFH is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWFH or AIS?

IWFH is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWFH or AIS?

IWFH and AIS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between IWFH and AIS?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IWFH and 0.75% for AIS.