IWF vs. EWC
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC).
IWF and EWC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. EWC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Canada Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. Both IWF and EWC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IWF vs. EWC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IWF vs. EWC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | -9.83% | 18.33% | 33.12% | 42.59% | -29.31% | 27.43% | 38.25% | 35.86% | -1.67% | 29.95% |
EWC iShares MSCI Canada ETF | 1.59% | 35.92% | 12.38% | 14.73% | -12.95% | 26.98% | 5.52% | 27.58% | -17.16% | 15.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWF achieves a -9.83% return, which is significantly lower than EWC's 1.59% return. Over the past 10 years, IWF has outperformed EWC with an annualized return of 16.53%, while EWC has yielded a comparatively lower 11.09% annualized return.
IWF
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- YTD
- -9.83%
- 6M
- -8.80%
- 1Y
- 18.54%
- 3Y*
- 21.01%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 16.53%
EWC
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- -5.50%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 9.35%
- 1Y
- 36.56%
- 3Y*
- 19.46%
- 5Y*
- 11.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWF vs. EWC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWF has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EWC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IWF vs. EWC — Risk / Return Rank
IWF
EWC
IWF vs. EWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWF | EWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 2.21 | -1.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.35 | 2.89 | -1.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.42 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 3.50 | -2.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.95 | 16.55 | -12.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWF | EWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 2.21 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.69 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.59 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.40 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between IWF and EWC is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IWF vs. EWC - Dividend Comparison
IWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than EWC's 1.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.36% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 0.49% | 0.66% | 0.99% | 1.27% | 1.10% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
EWC iShares MSCI Canada ETF | 1.43% | 1.45% | 2.23% | 2.27% | 2.34% | 1.85% | 2.09% | 2.16% | 2.65% | 1.97% | 1.75% | 2.34% |
Drawdowns
IWF vs. EWC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWF drawdown since its inception was -64.25%, which is greater than EWC's maximum drawdown of -60.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWF and EWC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWF | EWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.25% | -60.75% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.27% | -10.63% | -5.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.72% | -24.81% | -7.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.72% | -42.66% | +9.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.12% | -5.79% | -7.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.21% | -13.21% | -9.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.74% | 2.25% | +2.49% |
Volatility
IWF vs. EWC - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC) at 5.87%. This indicates that IWF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IWF | EWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.74% | 5.87% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.36% | 11.56% | +0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.40% | 16.62% | +5.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 17.24% | +4.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 18.80% | +2.12% |