EWC vs. EWA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC) and iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA).
EWC and EWA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EWC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Canada Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. EWA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Australia Index. It was launched on Mar 18, 1996. Both EWC and EWA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EWC or EWA.
Performance
EWC vs. EWA - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWC achieves a 18.17% return, which is significantly higher than EWA's 9.89% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EWC having a 5.69% annualized return and EWA not far behind at 5.49%.
EWC
18.17%
2.68%
14.57%
27.62%
10.26%
5.69%
EWA
9.89%
0.38%
9.17%
22.65%
7.35%
5.49%
Key characteristics
| EWC | EWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.06 | 1.32 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.82 | 1.91 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.36 | 1.23 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.20 | 1.95 |
| Martin Ratio | 14.46 | 7.02 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.91% | 3.16% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.43% | 16.80% |
| Max Drawdown | -60.75% | -66.98% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -3.21% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EWC vs. EWA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EWA's 0.50% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between EWC and EWA is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EWC vs. EWA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC) and iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EWC vs. EWA - Dividend Comparison
EWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than EWA's 3.65% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWC iShares MSCI Canada ETF | 1.94% | 2.27% | 2.34% | 1.85% | 2.09% | 2.16% | 2.65% | 1.97% | 1.75% | 2.34% | 2.15% | 2.37% |
EWA iShares MSCI-Australia ETF | 3.65% | 3.72% | 5.28% | 5.08% | 2.02% | 3.97% | 6.11% | 4.44% | 4.03% | 5.48% | 4.92% | 4.69% |
Drawdowns
EWC vs. EWA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWC drawdown since its inception was -60.75%, smaller than the maximum EWA drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWC and EWA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EWC vs. EWA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC) is 3.75%, while iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that EWC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.