EWC vs. BBCA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA).
EWC and BBCA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EWC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Canada Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. BBCA is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index. It was launched on Aug 7, 2018. Both EWC and BBCA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EWC vs. BBCA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EWC vs. BBCA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWC iShares MSCI Canada ETF | 1.59% | 35.92% | 12.38% | 14.73% | -12.95% | 26.98% | 5.52% | 27.58% | -15.94% |
BBCA JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF | 1.43% | 34.40% | 12.79% | 14.92% | -12.53% | 28.16% | 6.20% | 28.93% | -15.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWC achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than BBCA's 1.43% return.
EWC
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- -5.50%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 9.35%
- 1Y
- 36.56%
- 3Y*
- 19.46%
- 5Y*
- 11.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
BBCA
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 8.86%
- 1Y
- 34.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.20%
- 5Y*
- 12.04%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EWC vs. BBCA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BBCA's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EWC vs. BBCA — Risk / Return Rank
EWC
BBCA
EWC vs. BBCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWC | BBCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.21 | 2.13 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.89 | 2.81 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.41 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 3.33 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.55 | 15.60 | +0.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWC | BBCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 2.13 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.73 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.57 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between EWC and BBCA is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EWC vs. BBCA - Dividend Comparison
EWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than BBCA's 1.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWC iShares MSCI Canada ETF | 1.43% | 1.45% | 2.23% | 2.27% | 2.34% | 1.85% | 2.09% | 2.16% | 2.65% | 1.97% | 1.75% | 2.34% |
BBCA JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF | 1.86% | 1.83% | 2.36% | 2.51% | 2.65% | 2.17% | 2.41% | 2.32% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EWC vs. BBCA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWC drawdown since its inception was -60.75%, which is greater than BBCA's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWC and BBCA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWC | BBCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.75% | -42.81% | -17.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.63% | -10.42% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.81% | -24.43% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.79% | -5.68% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.21% | -5.97% | -7.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 2.23% | +0.02% |
Volatility
EWC vs. BBCA - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) have volatilities of 5.87% and 5.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EWC | BBCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.87% | 5.79% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.56% | 11.06% | +0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.62% | 16.08% | +0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 16.67% | +0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 20.27% | -1.47% |