IVRS vs. EFV

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

IVRS (iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF) and EFV (iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVRS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while EFV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Value Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVRS returned 7.39%/yr vs 21.80%/yr for EFV. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVRS charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for EFV.

Performance

IVRS vs. EFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -10.47% return, which is significantly lower than EFV's 8.83% return.

IVRS

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -6.24%
• YTD: -10.47%
• 6M: -12.42%
• 1Y: -9.78%
• 3Y*: 7.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EFV

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -1.19%
• YTD: 8.83%
• 6M: 8.60%
• 1Y: 26.67%
• 3Y*: 21.80%
• 5Y*: 12.45%
• 10Y*: 10.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVRS vs. EFV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF	-10.47%	12.75%	7.40%	28.15%
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF	8.83%	42.22%	5.35%	10.38%

Correlation

The correlation between IVRS and EFV is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023	0.55

The correlation between IVRS and EFV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVRS vs. EFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IVRS	EFV
Technology	51.6%	3.0%
Communication Services	28.5%	4.4%
Financial Services	19.9%	37.7%
Consumer Cyclical	3.1%	6.1%
Basic Materials	-	6.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	9.2%
Energy	-	6.8%
Healthcare	-	7.4%
Industrials	-	10.4%
Real Estate	-	2.8%
Utilities	-	5.9%

Return for Risk

IVRS vs. EFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVRS

IVRS Risk / Return Rank: 6
IVRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
IVRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
IVRS Omega Ratio Rank: 5
IVRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
IVRS Martin Ratio Rank: 6

EFV

EFV Risk / Return Rank: 60
EFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
EFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
EFV Omega Ratio Rank: 61
EFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
EFV Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVRS vs. EFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IVRS	EFV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	1.85	-2.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.45	2.59	-3.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.33	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.31	2.46	-2.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.64	9.04	-9.68

IVRS vs. EFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVRS Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the EFV Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVRS and EFV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IVRS vs. EFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, smaller than the maximum EFV drawdown of -63.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and EFV.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVRS	EFV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.43%	-63.94%	+32.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.43%	-10.90%	-20.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.43%	-13.72%	-17.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.84%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.98%	-2.78%	-20.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.05%	-14.79%	+8.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.36%	2.96%	+12.40%

Volatility

IVRS vs. EFV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) has a higher volatility of 8.14% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) at 4.19%. This indicates that IVRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVRS	EFV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.14%	4.19%	+3.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.86%	12.00%	+7.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.81%	14.49%	+8.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.71%	15.98%	+4.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.71%	17.52%	+3.19%

IVRS vs. EFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than EFV's 0.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVRS vs. EFV - Dividend Comparison

IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.95%, more than EFV's 4.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF	4.83%	4.16%	4.66%	4.36%	4.17%	4.07%	2.42%	4.62%	4.56%	3.56%	3.28%	3.59%
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF	8.95%	7.88%	6.65%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVRS and EFV in my portfolio?

IVRS and EFV have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVRS or EFV?

IVRS has higher volatility (8.14%) compared to EFV (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRS dropped -31.43% vs EFV's -63.94%.

Which ETF is better, IVRS or EFV?

On 3-year performance, EFV leads with 21.80% vs 7.39% for IVRS. On fees, EFV is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, EFV has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVRS or EFV?

Over the 3-year period, EFV has performed better with a 21.80% return vs 7.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVRS or EFV?

EFV is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IVRS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVRS or EFV?

IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.95%, compared with 4.83% for EFV.

What is the main difference between IVRS and EFV?

IVRS is categorized as Technology Equities, while EFV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IVRS tracks Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.31% for EFV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.