PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFV vs. SCHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFV vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFV achieves a 16.27% return, which is significantly higher than SCHF's 14.79% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EFV having a 10.63% annualized return and SCHF not far behind at 10.18%.


EFV

1D
-0.53%
1M
3.89%
6M
10.21%
YTD
16.27%
1Y
34.23%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
14.42%
10Y*
10.63%
ALL TIME*
6.14%

SCHF

1D
-0.58%
1M
-0.15%
6M
8.48%
YTD
14.79%
1Y
30.87%
3Y*
18.32%
5Y*
10.08%
10Y*
10.18%
ALL TIME*
7.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$244.79M$363.40M$390.92M
$215.25M$219.24M$213.98M

EFV vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
16.27%42.22%5.35%18.85%-5.22%11.08%-2.97%15.80%-14.67%21.22%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
14.79%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-14.29%26.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EFV and SCHF is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.96

The correlation between EFV and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFV vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFV
SCHF

Financial Services

38.8%
25.6%

Industrials

10.0%
14.3%

Consumer Defensive

9.8%
5.1%

Healthcare

7.6%
7.1%

Energy

6.2%
5.3%

Utilities

6.1%
3.2%

Basic Materials

6.0%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
6.3%

Communication Services

4.1%
2.4%

Technology

3.1%
16.4%

Real Estate

2.7%
1.9%

Financial Services

EFV
38.8%
SCHF
25.6%

Industrials

EFV
10.0%
SCHF
14.3%

Consumer Defensive

EFV
9.8%
SCHF
5.1%

Healthcare

EFV
7.6%
SCHF
7.1%

Energy

EFV
6.2%
SCHF
5.3%

Utilities

EFV
6.1%
SCHF
3.2%

Basic Materials

EFV
6.0%
SCHF
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EFV
5.6%
SCHF
6.3%

Communication Services

EFV
4.1%
SCHF
2.4%

Technology

EFV
3.1%
SCHF
16.4%

Real Estate

EFV
2.7%
SCHF
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFV vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EFV
EFV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFV Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
EFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EFV vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EFVSCHFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.32

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

2.65

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.73

9.84

+1.89

EFV vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFV Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFV and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFV vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFV drawdown since its inception was -63.94%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFV and SCHF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFVSCHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.94%

-34.87%

-29.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.90%

-11.48%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.72%

-13.41%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.84%

-29.14%

+3.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.16%

-34.87%

-8.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-2.45%

+1.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.72%

-7.33%

-7.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

3.08%

-0.17%

Volatility

EFV vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) is 4.20%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that EFV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFVSCHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

5.38%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

15.48%

-3.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.38%

17.39%

-3.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.94%

16.70%

-0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.46%

17.05%

+0.41%

EFV vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFV has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFV vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

EFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than SCHF's 3.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
4.52%4.16%4.66%4.36%4.17%4.07%2.42%4.62%4.56%3.56%3.28%3.59%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
3.07%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFV and SCHF have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHF has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to EFV (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFV dropped -63.94% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

On 10-year performance, EFV leads with 10.63% vs 10.18% for SCHF. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, EFV has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EFV has performed better with a 10.63% return vs 10.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EFV.

EFV has the higher dividend yield at 4.52%, compared with 3.07% for SCHF.

EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index (Net), while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for EFV and 0.06% for SCHF.

EFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFV and SCHF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer