PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVRS vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVRS vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -5.51% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 8.76% return.


IVRS

1D
-2.21%
1M
1.13%
YTD
-5.51%
6M
-8.57%
1Y
-1.11%
3Y*
9.46%
5Y*
10Y*

DGRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.14%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.75%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVRS vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF
-5.51%12.75%7.40%28.15%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.76%15.69%16.62%7.88%

Correlation

The correlation between IVRS and DGRO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2023

0.56

The correlation between IVRS and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IVRS vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVRS
DGRO

Technology

38.4%
19.4%

Communication Services

37.3%
0.1%

Financial Services

19.7%
21.2%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
5.7%

Basic Materials

-

2.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

11.5%

Energy

-

5.6%

Healthcare

-

16.4%

Industrials

-

10.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

6.9%

Technology

IVRS
38.4%
DGRO
19.4%

Communication Services

IVRS
37.3%
DGRO
0.1%

Financial Services

IVRS
19.7%
DGRO
21.2%

Consumer Cyclical

IVRS
4.6%
DGRO
5.7%

Basic Materials

IVRS

-

DGRO
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

IVRS

-

DGRO
11.5%

Energy

IVRS

-

DGRO
5.6%

Healthcare

IVRS

-

DGRO
16.4%

Industrials

IVRS

-

DGRO
10.8%

Real Estate

IVRS

-

DGRO

-

Utilities

IVRS

-

DGRO
6.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVRS vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVRS
IVRS Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
IVRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVRS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
IVRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVRS Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVRS vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVRSDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.43

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

3.50

-3.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.08

13.52

-13.60

IVRS vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVRS Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVRS and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVRSDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

2.39

-2.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.76

-0.16

Drawdowns

IVRS vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVRSDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.43%

-35.10%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.43%

-6.47%

-24.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.43%

-14.03%

-17.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.72%

-0.28%

-18.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-3.44%

-2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.55%

1.67%

+12.88%

Volatility

IVRS vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that IVRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVRSDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

2.21%

+3.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.59%

6.91%

+11.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.85%

9.48%

+12.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.49%

13.82%

+6.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.49%

16.62%

+3.87%

IVRS vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVRS vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, more than DGRO's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF
8.34%7.88%6.65%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVRS and DGRO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVRS has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRS dropped -31.43% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 3-year performance, DGRO leads with 16.99% vs 9.46% for IVRS. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 16.99% return vs 9.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IVRS.

IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.34%, compared with 1.96% for DGRO.

IVRS is categorized as Technology Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. IVRS tracks Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVRS and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer