IVRS vs. DGRO
IVRS (iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVRS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVRS returned 7.73%/yr vs 17.09%/yr for DGRO. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IVRS charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
IVRS vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -7.07% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 13.79% return.
IVRS
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- 6M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- -7.07%
- 1Y
- -11.56%
- 3Y*
- 7.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.16%
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- YTD
- 13.79%
- 1Y
- 24.64%
- 3Y*
- 17.09%
- 5Y*
- 11.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $107.57M | $103.25M | $110.55M | |
| $45.64K | $34.99K | $21.63K |
IVRS vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | -7.07% | 12.75% | 7.40% | 28.15% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 13.79% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 6.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVRS and DGRO is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023 | 0.53 |
The correlation between IVRS and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IVRS vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVRS
DGRO
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
IVRS
DGRO
Technology
IVRS
DGRO
Financial Services
IVRS
DGRO
Consumer Cyclical
IVRS
DGRO
Basic Materials
IVRS
-
DGRO
Consumer Defensive
IVRS
-
DGRO
Energy
IVRS
-
DGRO
Healthcare
IVRS
-
DGRO
Industrials
IVRS
-
DGRO
Real Estate
IVRS
-
DGRO
-
Utilities
IVRS
-
DGRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVRS vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
IVRS
DGRO
IVRS vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVRS | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.48 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 3.83 | -4.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | 14.91 | -15.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVRS vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVRS | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.43% | -35.10% | +3.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.43% | -6.47% | -24.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.43% | -14.03% | -17.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.06% | -1.01% | -19.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.51% | -3.41% | -3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.79% | 1.66% | +15.13% |
Volatility
IVRS vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.88%. This indicates that IVRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVRS | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 2.88% | +5.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.96% | 7.12% | +12.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.89% | 9.54% | +14.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 13.79% | +7.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 16.58% | +4.30% |
IVRS vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVRS vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.62%, more than DGRO's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.89% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | 8.62% | 7.88% | 6.65% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVRS and DGRO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVRS has higher volatility (7.97%) compared to DGRO (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRS dropped -31.43% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 3-year performance, DGRO leads with 17.09% vs 7.73% for IVRS. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 17.09% return vs 7.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IVRS.
IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.62%, compared with 1.89% for DGRO.
IVRS is categorized as Technology Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. IVRS tracks Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVRS and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer