PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVOO vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVOO vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IVOO having a 14.58% return and VYM slightly lower at 14.21%. Over the past 10 years, IVOO has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 10.98%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.71% annualized return.


IVOO

1D
-0.08%
1M
-1.02%
6M
10.08%
YTD
14.58%
1Y
22.85%
3Y*
12.98%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
10.98%
ALL TIME*
12.19%

VYM

1D
0.00%
1M
1.56%
6M
9.31%
YTD
14.21%
1Y
24.90%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
11.71%
ALL TIME*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.28M$9.17M$9.84M
$195.34M$198.02M$200.78M

IVOO vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
14.58%7.47%13.77%16.45%-13.17%24.61%13.61%26.18%-11.33%16.38%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
14.21%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOO and VYM is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.85

The correlation between IVOO and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVOO vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVOO
VYM

Industrials

25.4%
12.6%

Technology

17.4%
17.8%

Financial Services

13.8%
21.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
6.8%

Healthcare

8.9%
13.2%

Real Estate

7.2%
0.0%

Basic Materials

4.8%
3.3%

Energy

4.6%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
8.1%

Utilities

2.8%
5.7%

Communication Services

1.5%
3.0%

Industrials

IVOO
25.4%
VYM
12.6%

Technology

IVOO
17.4%
VYM
17.8%

Financial Services

IVOO
13.8%
VYM
21.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IVOO
10.5%
VYM
6.8%

Healthcare

IVOO
8.9%
VYM
13.2%

Real Estate

IVOO
7.2%
VYM
0.0%

Basic Materials

IVOO
4.8%
VYM
3.3%

Energy

IVOO
4.6%
VYM
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

IVOO
3.2%
VYM
8.1%

Utilities

IVOO
2.8%
VYM
5.7%

Communication Services

IVOO
1.5%
VYM
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVOO vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IVOO
IVOO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IVOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IVOO vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVOOVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.43

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

3.56

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

13.40

-4.68

IVOO vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOO and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVOO vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOO drawdown since its inception was -42.33%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOO and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVOOVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.33%

-56.98%

+14.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.81%

-6.69%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.22%

-14.46%

-9.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.22%

-15.84%

-8.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.33%

-35.21%

-7.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-1.15%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.23%

-7.14%

+1.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

1.78%

+0.64%

Volatility

IVOO vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) has a higher volatility of 3.43% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.46%. This indicates that IVOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVOOVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

2.46%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.63%

7.42%

+4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.74%

10.29%

+5.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.65%

13.87%

+5.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.15%

16.29%

+4.86%

IVOO vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVOO vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

IVOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than VYM's 2.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
1.18%1.35%1.30%1.25%1.58%1.14%1.23%1.49%1.56%1.22%1.37%1.45%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.24%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVOO and VYM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVOO has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to VYM (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOO dropped -42.33% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.71% vs 10.98% for IVOO. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.71% return vs 10.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IVOO.

VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.18% for IVOO.

IVOO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VYM is Dividend. IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IVOO and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVOO and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer