IVOO vs. VUG
IVOO (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVOO is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVOO returned 11.22%/yr vs 18.26%/yr for VUG. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVOO charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
IVOO vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOO achieves a 14.13% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.49% return. Over the past 10 years, IVOO has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 11.22%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.26% annualized return.
IVOO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 14.13%
- 6M
- 14.37%
- 1Y
- 25.48%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
VUG
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
IVOO vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 14.13% | 7.47% | 13.77% | 16.45% | -13.17% | 24.61% | 13.61% | 26.18% | -11.33% | 16.38% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 9.49% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOO and VUG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.77 |
The correlation between IVOO and VUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IVOO vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVOO
VUG
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
IVOO
VUG
Technology
IVOO
VUG
Financial Services
IVOO
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
IVOO
VUG
Healthcare
IVOO
VUG
Real Estate
IVOO
VUG
Energy
IVOO
VUG
Basic Materials
IVOO
VUG
Consumer Defensive
IVOO
VUG
Utilities
IVOO
VUG
Communication Services
IVOO
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOO vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
IVOO
VUG
IVOO vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVOO | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.65 | 1.77 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.41 | 2.40 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.31 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 1.69 | +1.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.61 | 5.92 | +4.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVOO | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.77 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.68 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.85 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
IVOO vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOO drawdown since its inception was -42.33%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOO and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOO | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.33% | -50.68% | +8.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.81% | -16.53% | +7.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.22% | -22.85% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.22% | -35.61% | +11.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.33% | -35.61% | -6.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -1.51% | +1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -7.09% | +1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 4.71% | -2.30% |
Volatility
IVOO vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 3.83%. This indicates that IVOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOO | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.39% | 3.83% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.36% | 12.11% | -0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 15.84% | -0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.72% | 22.22% | -2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 21.44% | -0.25% |
IVOO vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVOO vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
IVOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 1.19% | 1.35% | 1.30% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 1.14% | 1.23% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.45% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOO and VUG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVOO has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to VUG (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOO dropped -42.33% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 18.26% vs 11.22% for IVOO. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 18.26% return vs 11.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IVOO.
IVOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.
IVOO is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOO and 0.03% for VUG.
VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOO and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer