PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVOO vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVOO vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVOO achieves a 14.13% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.49% return. Over the past 10 years, IVOO has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 11.22%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.26% annualized return.


IVOO

1D
-0.02%
1M
3.90%
YTD
14.13%
6M
14.37%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
11.22%

VUG

1D
-1.23%
1M
6.22%
YTD
9.49%
6M
8.72%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
25.93%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
18.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVOO vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
14.13%7.47%13.77%16.45%-13.17%24.61%13.61%26.18%-11.33%16.38%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
9.49%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOO and VUG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.77

The correlation between IVOO and VUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IVOO vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVOO
VUG

Industrials

25.1%
3.6%

Technology

15.7%
53.5%

Financial Services

14.4%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
12.2%

Healthcare

8.6%
4.6%

Real Estate

7.5%
1.0%

Energy

5.5%
0.4%

Basic Materials

4.8%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
1.5%

Utilities

3.1%
0.9%

Communication Services

1.0%
17.3%

Industrials

IVOO
25.1%
VUG
3.6%

Technology

IVOO
15.7%
VUG
53.5%

Financial Services

IVOO
14.4%
VUG
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IVOO
10.7%
VUG
12.2%

Healthcare

IVOO
8.6%
VUG
4.6%

Real Estate

IVOO
7.5%
VUG
1.0%

Energy

IVOO
5.5%
VUG
0.4%

Basic Materials

IVOO
4.8%
VUG
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

IVOO
3.8%
VUG
1.5%

Utilities

IVOO
3.1%
VUG
0.9%

Communication Services

IVOO
1.0%
VUG
17.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVOO vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOO
IVOO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IVOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVOO vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVOOVUGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.65

1.77

-0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.41

2.40

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

1.69

+1.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.61

5.92

+4.69

IVOO vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOO and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVOOVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.77

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.68

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.85

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.62

0.00

Drawdowns

IVOO vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOO drawdown since its inception was -42.33%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOO and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVOOVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.33%

-50.68%

+8.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.81%

-16.53%

+7.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.22%

-22.85%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.22%

-35.61%

+11.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.33%

-35.61%

-6.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-1.51%

+1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-7.09%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

4.71%

-2.30%

Volatility

IVOO vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 3.83%. This indicates that IVOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVOOVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

3.83%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.36%

12.11%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

15.84%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.72%

22.22%

-2.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.19%

21.44%

-0.25%

IVOO vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVOO vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

IVOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
1.19%1.35%1.30%1.25%1.58%1.14%1.23%1.49%1.56%1.22%1.37%1.45%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVOO and VUG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVOO has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to VUG (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOO dropped -42.33% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 18.26% vs 11.22% for IVOO. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 18.26% return vs 11.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IVOO.

IVOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.

IVOO is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOO and 0.03% for VUG.

VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVOO and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer