PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSV vs. MGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSV vs. MGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSV achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 14.01% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSV has underperformed MGV with an annualized return of 12.06%, while MGV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.84% annualized return.


IUSV

1D
0.91%
1M
2.22%
YTD
8.61%
6M
9.11%
1Y
22.73%
3Y*
16.12%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
12.06%

MGV

1D
0.77%
1M
4.80%
YTD
14.01%
6M
14.90%
1Y
28.63%
3Y*
19.33%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
12.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSV vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
8.61%12.85%12.18%21.73%-5.40%25.22%1.56%31.47%-9.21%15.09%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
14.01%15.45%16.94%9.16%-1.22%25.93%2.50%25.54%-4.13%16.85%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSV and MGV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007

0.96

The correlation between IUSV and MGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUSV vs. MGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUSV
MGV

Technology

20.8%
14.2%

Financial Services

15.0%
23.9%

Industrials

11.2%
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
3.7%

Healthcare

11.0%
16.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.8%
11.9%

Energy

7.2%
6.6%

Utilities

4.3%
2.6%

Real Estate

3.7%
1.2%

Basic Materials

3.6%
2.4%

Communication Services

3.1%
3.4%

Technology

IUSV
20.8%
MGV
14.2%

Financial Services

IUSV
15.0%
MGV
23.9%

Industrials

IUSV
11.2%
MGV
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IUSV
11.1%
MGV
3.7%

Healthcare

IUSV
11.0%
MGV
16.6%

Consumer Defensive

IUSV
8.8%
MGV
11.9%

Energy

IUSV
7.2%
MGV
6.6%

Utilities

IUSV
4.3%
MGV
2.6%

Real Estate

IUSV
3.7%
MGV
1.2%

Basic Materials

IUSV
3.6%
MGV
2.4%

Communication Services

IUSV
3.1%
MGV
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSV vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSV
IUSV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IUSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSV Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

MGV
MGV Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSV vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUSVMGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.53

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

4.48

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.74

17.05

-3.31

IUSV vs. MGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSV Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the MGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSV and MGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUSVMGVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

2.93

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.90

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.79

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.48

+0.12

Drawdowns

IUSV vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSV drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, roughly equal to the maximum MGV drawdown of -55.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSV and MGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSVMGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.88%

-55.87%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.36%

-6.42%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.76%

-13.18%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.95%

-16.54%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.54%

-35.41%

-2.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-7.69%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

1.68%

-0.02%

Volatility

IUSV vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) is 2.13%, while Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) has a volatility of 2.37%. This indicates that IUSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSVMGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.13%

2.37%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.19%

7.49%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.00%

9.85%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.56%

13.57%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.07%

16.33%

+0.74%

IUSV vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUSV vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison

IUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than MGV's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
1.67%1.78%2.15%1.75%2.22%1.87%2.40%2.19%2.67%1.93%4.44%7.63%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
1.87%2.04%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, IUSV and MGV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MGV has higher volatility (2.37%) compared to IUSV (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSV dropped -56.88% vs MGV's -55.87%.

On 10-year performance, MGV leads with 12.84% vs 12.06% for IUSV. On fees, IUSV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSV has been the lower-risk option at 2.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MGV has performed better with a 12.84% return vs 12.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGV.

MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.67% for IUSV.

IUSV tracks S&P 900 Value Index, while MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSV and 0.05% for MGV.

MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSV and MGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer