PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSV vs. IUSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSV vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSV achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly lower than IUSG's 9.19% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSV has underperformed IUSG with an annualized return of 12.30%, while IUSG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.77% annualized return.


IUSV

1D
-0.36%
1M
-0.29%
YTD
7.71%
6M
7.04%
1Y
20.11%
3Y*
15.13%
5Y*
11.05%
10Y*
12.30%

IUSG

1D
-2.31%
1M
-1.86%
YTD
9.19%
6M
7.87%
1Y
26.96%
3Y*
25.00%
5Y*
13.77%
10Y*
17.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSV vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
7.71%12.85%12.18%21.73%-5.40%25.22%1.56%31.47%-9.21%15.09%
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
9.19%21.23%34.70%29.28%-28.81%31.26%32.65%30.62%-0.79%27.02%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSV and IUSG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2000

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between IUSV and IUSG has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IUSV vs. IUSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUSV
IUSG

Technology

21.7%
50.8%

Financial Services

14.9%
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
8.4%

Healthcare

11.1%
6.4%

Industrials

10.9%
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
1.2%

Energy

7.0%
0.3%

Utilities

4.3%
1.1%

Real Estate

3.7%
0.8%

Basic Materials

3.5%
0.5%

Communication Services

3.0%
15.2%

Technology

IUSV
21.7%
IUSG
50.8%

Financial Services

IUSV
14.9%
IUSG
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IUSV
11.2%
IUSG
8.4%

Healthcare

IUSV
11.1%
IUSG
6.4%

Industrials

IUSV
10.9%
IUSG
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

IUSV
8.7%
IUSG
1.2%

Energy

IUSV
7.0%
IUSG
0.3%

Utilities

IUSV
4.3%
IUSG
1.1%

Real Estate

IUSV
3.7%
IUSG
0.8%

Basic Materials

IUSV
3.5%
IUSG
0.5%

Communication Services

IUSV
3.0%
IUSG
15.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSV vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSV
IUSV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IUSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSG
IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSV vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUSVIUSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.28

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

2.07

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.08

8.45

+3.63

IUSV vs. IUSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSV Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the IUSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSV and IUSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUSV vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSV drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSV and IUSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSVIUSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.88%

-63.41%

+6.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.36%

-13.07%

+6.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.76%

-22.28%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.95%

-32.21%

+14.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.54%

-32.35%

-5.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-5.23%

+3.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.28%

-21.40%

+15.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

3.20%

-1.53%

Volatility

IUSV vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) is 3.03%, while iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that IUSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSVIUSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

7.16%

-4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.46%

13.66%

-6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.11%

16.92%

-6.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.53%

21.06%

-6.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

20.48%

-3.44%

IUSV vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IUSV and IUSG have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUSV vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison

IUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than IUSG's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
0.50%0.53%0.59%1.12%1.07%0.59%0.93%1.64%1.32%1.28%1.48%1.29%
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
1.70%1.78%2.15%1.75%2.22%1.87%2.40%2.19%2.67%1.93%4.44%7.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUSV and IUSG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IUSG has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to IUSV (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSV dropped -56.88% vs IUSG's -63.41%.

On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.77% vs 12.30% for IUSV. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, IUSV has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.77% return vs 12.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSV and IUSG have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

IUSV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.50% for IUSG.

IUSV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IUSG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IUSV tracks S&P 900 Value Index, while IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index.

IUSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSV and IUSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer