IUSV vs. IUSG
IUSV (iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF) and IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Value Index, while IUSG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUSV returned 12.30%/yr vs 17.77%/yr for IUSG. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
IUSV vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSV achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly lower than IUSG's 9.19% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSV has underperformed IUSG with an annualized return of 12.30%, while IUSG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.77% annualized return.
IUSV
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 7.71%
- 6M
- 7.04%
- 1Y
- 20.11%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
IUSG
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- 9.19%
- 6M
- 7.87%
- 1Y
- 26.96%
- 3Y*
- 25.00%
- 5Y*
- 13.77%
- 10Y*
- 17.77%
IUSV vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF | 7.71% | 12.85% | 12.18% | 21.73% | -5.40% | 25.22% | 1.56% | 31.47% | -9.21% | 15.09% |
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 9.19% | 21.23% | 34.70% | 29.28% | -28.81% | 31.26% | 32.65% | 30.62% | -0.79% | 27.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSV and IUSG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2000 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IUSV and IUSG has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IUSV vs. IUSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUSV
IUSG
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
IUSV
IUSG
Financial Services
IUSV
IUSG
Consumer Cyclical
IUSV
IUSG
Healthcare
IUSV
IUSG
Industrials
IUSV
IUSG
Consumer Defensive
IUSV
IUSG
Energy
IUSV
IUSG
Utilities
IUSV
IUSG
Real Estate
IUSV
IUSG
Basic Materials
IUSV
IUSG
Communication Services
IUSV
IUSG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSV vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank
IUSV
IUSG
IUSV vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUSV | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.28 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 2.07 | +1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.08 | 8.45 | +3.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUSV vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSV drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSV and IUSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSV | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.88% | -63.41% | +6.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.36% | -13.07% | +6.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.76% | -22.28% | +4.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.95% | -32.21% | +14.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.54% | -32.35% | -5.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -5.23% | +3.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.28% | -21.40% | +15.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 3.20% | -1.53% |
Volatility
IUSV vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) is 3.03%, while iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that IUSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSV | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.03% | 7.16% | -4.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.46% | 13.66% | -6.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.11% | 16.92% | -6.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 21.06% | -6.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 20.48% | -3.44% |
IUSV vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IUSV and IUSG have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUSV vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison
IUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than IUSG's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.59% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.64% | 1.32% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.29% |
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF | 1.70% | 1.78% | 2.15% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 1.87% | 2.40% | 2.19% | 2.67% | 1.93% | 4.44% | 7.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSV and IUSG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IUSG has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to IUSV (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSV dropped -56.88% vs IUSG's -63.41%.
On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.77% vs 12.30% for IUSV. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, IUSV has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.77% return vs 12.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSV and IUSG have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.
IUSV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.50% for IUSG.
IUSV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IUSG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IUSV tracks S&P 900 Value Index, while IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index.
IUSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IUSV and IUSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer