PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISHP vs. XLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISHP vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISHP achieves a -10.97% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 5.94% return.


ISHP

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
-10.97%
6M
-10.01%
1Y
-7.50%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
1.58%
10Y*

XLP

1D
-0.24%
1M
-2.78%
YTD
5.94%
6M
5.31%
1Y
1.46%
3Y*
6.45%
5Y*
5.54%
10Y*
7.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISHP vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISHP
First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF
-10.97%12.27%24.17%22.24%-33.79%30.09%15.33%19.74%-2.04%7.66%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
5.94%1.52%12.20%-0.82%-0.81%17.20%10.11%27.43%-8.07%12.98%

Correlation

The correlation between ISHP and XLP is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2016

0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between ISHP and XLP has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ISHP vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISHP
XLP

Consumer Cyclical

40.9%
1.0%

Communication Services

24.5%

-

Industrials

13.1%

-

Technology

10.2%

-

Real Estate

4.9%

-

Healthcare

3.0%

-

Financial Services

1.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
99.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

ISHP
40.9%
XLP
1.0%

Communication Services

ISHP
24.5%
XLP

-

Industrials

ISHP
13.1%
XLP

-

Technology

ISHP
10.2%
XLP

-

Real Estate

ISHP
4.9%
XLP

-

Healthcare

ISHP
3.0%
XLP

-

Financial Services

ISHP
1.8%
XLP

-

Consumer Defensive

ISHP
1.6%
XLP
99.0%

Basic Materials

ISHP

-

XLP

-

Energy

ISHP

-

XLP

-

Utilities

ISHP

-

XLP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISHP vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISHP
ISHP Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ISHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISHP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ISHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISHP Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

XLP
XLP Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISHP vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISHPXLPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.44

0.12

-0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.50

0.26

-0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.03

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

0.16

-0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.59

0.31

-0.90

ISHP vs. XLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISHP Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISHP and XLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISHPXLPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

0.12

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.42

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.43

-0.14

Drawdowns

ISHP vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISHP drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISHP and XLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISHPXLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.57%

-35.90%

-11.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.75%

-9.69%

-15.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.75%

-12.39%

-12.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.57%

-16.30%

-31.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.21%

-8.58%

-9.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.65%

-7.06%

-5.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.39%

4.90%

+6.49%

Volatility

ISHP vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) have volatilities of 3.98% and 3.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISHPXLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

3.99%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.27%

9.86%

+3.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.13%

12.66%

+4.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.29%

13.30%

+13.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.09%

14.73%

+9.36%

ISHP vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISHP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISHP vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

ISHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than XLP's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISHP
First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF
1.50%1.34%1.02%1.58%0.76%0.53%0.82%1.16%0.89%1.65%0.23%0.00%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.66%2.75%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISHP and XLP have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLP has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to ISHP (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISHP dropped -47.57% vs XLP's -35.90%.

On 5-year performance, XLP leads with 5.54% vs 1.58% for ISHP. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLP has performed better with a 5.54% return vs 1.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISHP.

XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 1.50% for ISHP.

ISHP is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, while XLP tracks S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ISHP and 0.08% for XLP.

XLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISHP and XLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer