ISHP vs. TMH
ISHP (First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF) and TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - ISHP tracks the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index while TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. ISHP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for TMH.
Performance
ISHP vs. TMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ISHP
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- -10.97%
- 6M
- -10.01%
- 1Y
- -7.50%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- —
TMH
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISHP vs. TMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 1.93% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -5.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISHP and TMH is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | -1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISHP vs. TMH — Risk / Return Rank
ISHP
TMH
ISHP vs. TMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISHP | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISHP | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | -6.75 | +7.04 |
Drawdowns
ISHP vs. TMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISHP drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, which is greater than TMH's maximum drawdown of -5.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISHP and TMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISHP | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.57% | -5.57% | -42.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.21% | -5.57% | -12.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.65% | -3.76% | -8.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.39% | — | — |
Volatility
ISHP vs. TMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISHP | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.13% | 18.01% | -0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.29% | 18.01% | +9.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 18.01% | +6.08% |
ISHP vs. TMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISHP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISHP vs. TMH - Dividend Comparison
ISHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, while TMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 1.50% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 1.58% | 0.76% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 1.65% | 0.23% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISHP and TMH have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISHP.
ISHP has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.00% for TMH.
ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, while TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ISHP and 0.19% for TMH.
Find the right allocation for ISHP and TMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer