ISHP vs. TMH
ISHP (First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF) and TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - ISHP tracks the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index while TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ISHP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for TMH.
Performance
ISHP vs. TMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ISHP
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 4.54%
- 6M
- -7.70%
- YTD
- -8.73%
- 1Y
- -8.31%
- 3Y*
- 8.87%
- 5Y*
- 2.04%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.29%
TMH
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- 6.96%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.11K | $5.31K | $3.27K | |
| $27.07K | $29.18K | $21.96K |
ISHP vs. TMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 4.91% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISHP and TMH is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISHP vs. TMH — Risk / Return Rank
ISHP
TMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ISHP vs. TMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISHP | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISHP vs. TMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISHP drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, which is greater than TMH's maximum drawdown of -10.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISHP and TMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISHP | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.57% | -10.32% | -37.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.15% | -4.33% | -11.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.76% | -5.05% | -7.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.89% | — | — |
Volatility
ISHP vs. TMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISHP | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.30% | 26.85% | -8.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.32% | 26.85% | +0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.03% | 26.85% | -2.82% |
ISHP vs. TMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISHP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISHP vs. TMH - Dividend Comparison
ISHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than TMH's 4.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 1.14% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 1.58% | 0.76% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 1.65% | 0.23% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 4.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISHP and TMH have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISHP.
TMH has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 1.14% for ISHP.
ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, while TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ISHP and 0.19% for TMH.
Find the right allocation for ISHP and TMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer