ISHP vs. FDL
ISHP (First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ISHP is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISHP returned 1.58%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for FDL. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISHP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FDL.
Performance
ISHP vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISHP achieves a -11.94% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 15.23% return.
ISHP
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- 6M
- -15.90%
- YTD
- -11.94%
- 1Y
- -11.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.13%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- YTD
- 15.23%
- 1Y
- 20.80%
- 3Y*
- 18.71%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
ISHP vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | -11.94% | 12.27% | 24.17% | 22.24% | -33.79% | 30.09% | 15.33% | 19.74% | -2.04% | 7.66% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 15.23% | 14.79% | 17.98% | 2.94% | 6.66% | 26.10% | -4.30% | 24.41% | -5.99% | 12.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISHP and FDL is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2016 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ISHP and FDL has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ISHP vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISHP
FDL
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
ISHP
FDL
Communication Services
ISHP
FDL
Industrials
ISHP
FDL
Technology
ISHP
FDL
Real Estate
ISHP
FDL
-
Healthcare
ISHP
FDL
Financial Services
ISHP
FDL
Consumer Defensive
ISHP
FDL
Basic Materials
ISHP
-
FDL
Energy
ISHP
-
FDL
Utilities
ISHP
-
FDL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISHP vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
ISHP
FDL
ISHP vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISHP | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.31 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 4.89 | -5.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.90 | 11.11 | -12.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISHP vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISHP drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISHP and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISHP | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.57% | -65.93% | +18.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.75% | -4.27% | -20.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | -12.24% | -12.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.57% | -16.46% | -31.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.10% | -0.89% | -18.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.74% | -9.62% | -3.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.26% | 1.88% | +11.38% |
Volatility
ISHP vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 4.65%. This indicates that ISHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISHP | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 4.65% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.24% | 8.37% | +5.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.76% | 11.65% | +6.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.27% | 14.37% | +12.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.04% | 17.12% | +6.92% |
ISHP vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISHP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISHP vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
ISHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than FDL's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.68% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 1.18% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 1.58% | 0.76% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 1.65% | 0.23% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISHP and FDL have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISHP has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to FDL (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISHP dropped -47.57% vs FDL's -65.93%.
On 5-year performance, FDL leads with 13.58% vs 1.58% for ISHP. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDL has performed better with a 13.58% return vs 1.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISHP.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.18% for ISHP.
ISHP is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ISHP and 0.43% for FDL.
FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISHP and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer