ISCB vs. EMLC
ISCB (iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF) and EMLC (VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISCB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Small Cap Extended Index, while EMLC is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index Emerging Markets Global Core Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISCB returned 9.71%/yr vs 2.28%/yr for EMLC. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISCB charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EMLC.
Performance
ISCB vs. EMLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISCB achieves a 13.51% return, which is significantly higher than EMLC's 1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, ISCB has outperformed EMLC with an annualized return of 9.71%, while EMLC has yielded a comparatively lower 2.28% annualized return.
ISCB
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 13.51%
- 6M
- 11.70%
- 1Y
- 30.13%
- 3Y*
- 15.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.71%
EMLC
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- 8.78%
- 3Y*
- 6.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- 2.28%
ISCB vs. EMLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | 13.51% | 12.46% | 10.90% | 19.51% | -19.04% | 17.46% | 6.29% | 29.42% | -13.92% | 12.95% |
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 1.40% | 18.81% | -2.97% | 11.18% | -10.58% | -9.72% | 3.08% | 9.79% | -7.57% | 13.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISCB and EMLC is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2010 | 0.42 |
The correlation between ISCB and EMLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (10 years) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISCB vs. EMLC — Risk / Return Rank
ISCB
EMLC
ISCB vs. EMLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) and VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISCB | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.24 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 1.42 | +1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.52 | 4.75 | +6.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISCB vs. EMLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISCB drawdown since its inception was -61.25%, which is greater than EMLC's maximum drawdown of -32.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCB and EMLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISCB | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.25% | -32.43% | -28.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -6.19% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.22% | -9.15% | -17.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.94% | -24.70% | -5.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.18% | -26.47% | -17.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.83% | +3.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.79% | -14.35% | +4.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 1.86% | +0.77% |
Volatility
ISCB vs. EMLC - Volatility Comparison
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) at 2.44%. This indicates that ISCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISCB | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 2.44% | +2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.80% | 6.17% | +5.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.76% | 7.06% | +9.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.43% | 9.14% | +12.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.70% | 10.04% | +12.66% |
ISCB vs. EMLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISCB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than EMLC's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISCB vs. EMLC - Dividend Comparison
ISCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than EMLC's 6.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 6.16% | 5.91% | 6.55% | 5.97% | 5.54% | 5.25% | 4.90% | 6.25% | 6.50% | 5.34% | 5.32% | 6.25% |
ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | 1.24% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.49% | 1.63% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.25% | 1.60% | 1.24% | 1.58% | 1.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISCB and EMLC have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISCB has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to EMLC (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCB dropped -61.25% vs EMLC's -32.43%.
On 10-year performance, ISCB leads with 9.71% vs 2.28% for EMLC. On fees, ISCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, EMLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ISCB has performed better with a 9.71% return vs 2.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EMLC.
EMLC has the higher dividend yield at 6.16%, compared with 1.24% for ISCB.
ISCB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while EMLC is Emerging Markets Bonds. ISCB tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Extended Index, while EMLC tracks J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index Emerging Markets Global Core Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ISCB and 0.30% for EMLC.
ISCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISCB and EMLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer