IRTR vs. EAOM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IRTR (Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF) and EAOM (iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IRTR is a Target Retirement Date fund actively managed by iShares, while EAOM is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the BlackRock ESG Aware Moderate Allocation Index. IRTR is actively managed, while EAOM is passively managed. Over the past year, IRTR returned 13.84% vs 14.38% for EAOM. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IRTR charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOM.

Performance

IRTR vs. EAOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF (IRTR) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IRTR having a 5.36% return and EAOM slightly lower at 5.30%.

IRTR

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.82%
• YTD: 5.36%
• 6M: 5.66%
• 1Y: 13.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EAOM

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 2.02%
• YTD: 5.30%
• 6M: 5.55%
• 1Y: 14.38%
• 3Y*: 10.61%
• 5Y*: 4.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRTR vs. EAOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IRTR Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF	5.36%	12.70%	7.59%	10.63%
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF	5.30%	12.90%	7.29%	10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between IRTR and EAOM is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023	0.98

The correlation between IRTR and EAOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

IRTR vs. EAOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IRTR	EAOM
Technology	26.8%	30.2%
Financial Services	15.0%	16.6%
Industrials	12.6%	11.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.0%	9.5%
Communication Services	8.0%	8.3%
Healthcare	7.7%	8.6%
Energy	4.9%	3.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	4.4%
Utilities	4.3%	2.5%
Basic Materials	3.8%	2.8%
Real Estate	3.5%	2.3%

Return for Risk

IRTR vs. EAOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRTR

IRTR Risk / Return Rank: 70
IRTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
IRTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
IRTR Omega Ratio Rank: 76
IRTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
IRTR Martin Ratio Rank: 69

EAOM

EAOM Risk / Return Rank: 68
EAOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
EAOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
EAOM Omega Ratio Rank: 72
EAOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
EAOM Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRTR vs. EAOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF (IRTR) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IRTR	EAOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	2.25	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	3.25	+0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.42	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	2.79	+0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.70	12.30	+0.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IRTR vs. EAOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRTR Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the EAOM Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRTR and EAOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IRTR	EAOM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	2.25	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.02	0.76	+1.26

Drawdowns

IRTR vs. EAOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRTR drawdown since its inception was -6.29%, smaller than the maximum EAOM drawdown of -20.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRTR and EAOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	IRTR	EAOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.29%	-20.73%	+14.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.82%	-5.17%	+0.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.63%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-0.24%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.78%	-4.96%	+4.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.09%	1.17%	-0.08%

Volatility

IRTR vs. EAOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF (IRTR) is 2.12%, while iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) has a volatility of 2.27%. This indicates that IRTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IRTR	EAOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.12%	2.27%	-0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.85%	5.24%	-0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.00%	6.44%	-0.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.03%	8.06%	-1.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.03%	7.90%	-0.87%

IRTR vs. EAOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRTR has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than EAOM's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IRTR vs. EAOM - Dividend Comparison

IRTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than EAOM's 2.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF	2.78%	2.89%	2.89%	2.70%	1.93%	1.32%	1.02%
IRTR Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF	2.99%	3.03%	3.03%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IRTR and EAOM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, IRTR and EAOM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IRTR or EAOM?

EAOM has higher volatility (2.27%) compared to IRTR (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRTR dropped -6.29% vs EAOM's -20.73%.

Which ETF is better, IRTR or EAOM?

On 1-year performance, EAOM leads with 14.38% vs 13.84% for IRTR. On fees, IRTR is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IRTR has been the lower-risk option at 2.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IRTR or EAOM?

Over the 1-year period, EAOM has performed better with a 14.38% return vs 13.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IRTR or EAOM?

IRTR is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EAOM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IRTR or EAOM?

IRTR has the higher dividend yield at 2.99%, compared with 2.78% for EAOM.

What is the main difference between IRTR and EAOM?

IRTR is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while EAOM is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for IRTR and 0.18% for EAOM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IRTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.