IRTR vs. ITDB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF (IRTR) and Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB).

IRTR and ITDB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IRTR is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Oct 17, 2023. ITDB is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Oct 17, 2023.

Performance

IRTR vs. ITDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF (IRTR) and Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IRTR vs. ITDB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IRTR Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF	-0.31%	12.70%	7.59%	10.63%
ITDB Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF	-0.58%	14.58%	9.65%	11.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRTR achieves a -0.31% return, which is significantly higher than ITDB's -0.58% return.

IRTR

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -3.29%
• YTD: -0.31%
• 6M: 1.31%
• 1Y: 10.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ITDB

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: -3.88%
• YTD: -0.58%
• 6M: 1.36%
• 1Y: 12.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRTR vs. ITDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRTR has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than ITDB's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

ITDB

Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF

IRTR

Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF

Return for Risk

IRTR vs. ITDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRTR

IRTR Risk / Return Rank: 80
IRTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
IRTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
IRTR Omega Ratio Rank: 80
IRTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
IRTR Martin Ratio Rank: 82

ITDB

ITDB Risk / Return Rank: 76
ITDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
ITDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
ITDB Omega Ratio Rank: 77
ITDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
ITDB Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRTR vs. ITDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF (IRTR) and Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IRTR	ITDB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	1.33	+0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	1.88	+0.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.29	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.00	1.86	+0.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.72	8.41	+0.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IRTR vs. ITDB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the ITDB Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRTR and ITDB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IRTR	ITDB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40	1.33	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.81	1.71	+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between IRTR and ITDB is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

IRTR vs. ITDB - Dividend Comparison

IRTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than ITDB's 2.06% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IRTR Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF	3.07%	3.03%	3.03%	0.85%
ITDB Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF	2.06%	2.05%	1.96%	0.62%

Drawdowns

IRTR vs. ITDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRTR drawdown since its inception was -6.29%, smaller than the maximum ITDB drawdown of -8.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRTR and ITDB.

Drawdown Indicators

	IRTR	ITDB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.29%	-8.41%	+2.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.48%	-6.94%	+1.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.32%	-4.05%	+0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.79%	-0.95%	+0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.26%	1.53%	-0.27%

Volatility

IRTR vs. ITDB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF (IRTR) is 3.14%, while Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that IRTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITDB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IRTR	ITDB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	3.74%	-0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.42%	5.48%	-1.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.73%	9.59%	-1.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.04%	8.61%	-1.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.04%	8.61%	-1.57%