PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EAOM vs. VGT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EAOM and VGT is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

EAOM vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%140.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
21.11%
134.72%
EAOM
VGT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EAOM:

1.39

VGT:

1.06

Sortino Ratio

EAOM:

1.96

VGT:

1.49

Omega Ratio

EAOM:

1.25

VGT:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

EAOM:

1.27

VGT:

1.57

Martin Ratio

EAOM:

6.50

VGT:

5.43

Ulcer Index

EAOM:

1.39%

VGT:

4.40%

Daily Std Dev

EAOM:

6.52%

VGT:

22.46%

Max Drawdown

EAOM:

-20.73%

VGT:

-54.63%

Current Drawdown

EAOM:

-1.14%

VGT:

-4.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOM achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's -0.12% return.


EAOM

YTD

1.77%

1M

1.77%

6M

3.99%

1Y

9.10%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

VGT

YTD

-0.12%

1M

-0.92%

6M

16.27%

1Y

21.69%

5Y*

19.58%

10Y*

20.73%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EAOM vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
Expense ratio chart for EAOM: current value at 0.18% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.18%
Expense ratio chart for VGT: current value at 0.10% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.10%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EAOM vs. VGT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EAOM is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EAOM is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EAOM is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EAOM is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EAOM is 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EAOM is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VGT is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VGT is 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VGT is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VGT is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VGT is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VGT is 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EAOM vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EAOM, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.391.06
The chart of Sortino ratio for EAOM, currently valued at 1.96, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.961.49
The chart of Omega ratio for EAOM, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.251.20
The chart of Calmar ratio for EAOM, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.271.57
The chart of Martin ratio for EAOM, currently valued at 6.50, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.006.505.43
EAOM
VGT

The current EAOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOM and VGT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.39
1.06
EAOM
VGT

Dividends

EAOM vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

EAOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than VGT's 0.60% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
2.85%2.90%2.70%1.93%1.32%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.60%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%1.12%

Drawdowns

EAOM vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOM drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOM and VGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.14%
-4.04%
EAOM
VGT

Volatility

EAOM vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) is 2.04%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 8.24%. This indicates that EAOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.04%
8.24%
EAOM
VGT
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab