PortfoliosLab logo
EAOM vs. VGT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EAOM and VGT is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

EAOM vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EAOM:

1.06

VGT:

0.47

Sortino Ratio

EAOM:

1.47

VGT:

0.71

Omega Ratio

EAOM:

1.20

VGT:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

EAOM:

1.16

VGT:

0.40

Martin Ratio

EAOM:

4.70

VGT:

1.29

Ulcer Index

EAOM:

1.74%

VGT:

8.45%

Daily Std Dev

EAOM:

8.22%

VGT:

30.25%

Max Drawdown

EAOM:

-20.73%

VGT:

-54.63%

Current Drawdown

EAOM:

-0.04%

VGT:

-6.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOM achieves a 3.23% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's -2.36% return.


EAOM

YTD

3.23%

1M

1.89%

6M

0.97%

1Y

8.67%

3Y*

5.47%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

VGT

YTD

-2.36%

1M

10.36%

6M

-2.31%

1Y

13.93%

3Y*

19.73%

5Y*

19.26%

10Y*

19.78%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EAOM vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EAOM vs. VGT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EAOM is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EAOM is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EAOM is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EAOM is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EAOM is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EAOM is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VGT is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VGT is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VGT is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VGT is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VGT is 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VGT is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EAOM vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EAOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOM and VGT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

EAOM vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

EAOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than VGT's 0.53% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
2.96%2.90%2.70%1.93%1.32%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.53%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%1.12%

Drawdowns

EAOM vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOM drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOM and VGT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

EAOM vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) is 1.92%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.70%. This indicates that EAOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...