EAOM vs. MKAM
EAOM (iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF) and MKAM (MKAM ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. EAOM is passively managed, while MKAM is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, EAOM returned 10.14%/yr vs 9.64%/yr for MKAM. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EAOM charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for MKAM.
Performance
EAOM vs. MKAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAOM achieves a 4.48% return, which is significantly higher than MKAM's 3.90% return.
EAOM
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 4.48%
- 6M
- 4.28%
- 1Y
- 13.00%
- 3Y*
- 10.14%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- —
MKAM
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 3.90%
- 6M
- 3.53%
- 1Y
- 12.35%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAOM vs. MKAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF | 4.48% | 12.90% | 7.29% | 6.45% |
MKAM MKAM ETF | 3.90% | 8.07% | 12.15% | 7.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAOM and MKAM is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2023 | 0.80 |
The correlation between EAOM and MKAM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAOM vs. MKAM — Risk / Return Rank
EAOM
MKAM
EAOM vs. MKAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and MKAM ETF (MKAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EAOM | MKAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 3.33 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.90 | 12.19 | -1.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EAOM vs. MKAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAOM drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, which is greater than MKAM's maximum drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOM and MKAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAOM | MKAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.73% | -5.01% | -15.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.17% | -3.72% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.63% | -5.01% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -1.52% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -1.13% | -3.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.20% | 1.02% | +0.18% |
Volatility
EAOM vs. MKAM - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) has a higher volatility of 2.76% compared to MKAM ETF (MKAM) at 2.40%. This indicates that EAOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAOM | MKAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.76% | 2.40% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.72% | 4.94% | +0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.84% | 6.41% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.14% | 6.31% | +1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.94% | 6.31% | +1.63% |
EAOM vs. MKAM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAOM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MKAM's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
EAOM vs. MKAM - Dividend Comparison
EAOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than MKAM's 2.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF | 2.80% | 2.89% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 1.93% | 1.32% | 1.02% |
MKAM MKAM ETF | 2.94% | 2.56% | 1.88% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EAOM and MKAM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EAOM has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to MKAM (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOM dropped -20.73% vs MKAM's -5.01%.
On 3-year performance, EAOM leads with 10.14% vs 9.64% for MKAM. On fees, EAOM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, MKAM has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EAOM has performed better with a 10.14% return vs 9.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EAOM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for MKAM.
MKAM has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 2.80% for EAOM.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and MKAM. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOM and 0.96% for MKAM.
MKAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EAOM and MKAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer