EAOM vs. GAA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA).
EAOM and GAA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EAOM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the BlackRock ESG Aware Moderate Allocation Index. It was launched on Jun 12, 2020. GAA is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Dec 9, 2014.
Performance
EAOM vs. GAA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EAOM vs. GAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF | -0.60% | 12.90% | 7.29% | 11.83% | -15.48% | 6.39% | 10.30% |
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF | 4.83% | 18.76% | 6.67% | 7.65% | -8.47% | 11.17% | 16.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAOM achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than GAA's 4.83% return.
EAOM
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- -0.60%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 10.92%
- 3Y*
- 8.70%
- 5Y*
- 3.67%
- 10Y*
- —
GAA
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 4.83%
- 6M
- 8.44%
- 1Y
- 20.85%
- 3Y*
- 12.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- 7.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EAOM vs. GAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAOM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than GAA's 0.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EAOM vs. GAA — Risk / Return Rank
EAOM
GAA
EAOM vs. GAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EAOM | GAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 2.03 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 2.70 | -0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.38 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 2.87 | -0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.33 | 11.69 | -3.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EAOM | GAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 2.03 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.58 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.61 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between EAOM and GAA is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EAOM vs. GAA - Dividend Comparison
EAOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than GAA's 3.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF | 2.91% | 2.89% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 1.93% | 1.32% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF | 3.74% | 4.24% | 3.88% | 3.73% | 6.05% | 4.21% | 2.73% | 3.32% | 3.01% | 2.36% | 2.82% | 2.49% |
Drawdowns
EAOM vs. GAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAOM drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, smaller than the maximum GAA drawdown of -26.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOM and GAA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAOM | GAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.73% | -26.57% | +5.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -7.18% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.73% | -18.47% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.31% | -3.40% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -3.90% | -1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.35% | 1.76% | -0.41% |
Volatility
EAOM vs. GAA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) is 3.27%, while Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that EAOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EAOM | GAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 3.81% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.82% | 7.24% | -2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.04% | 10.34% | -2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.01% | 11.27% | -3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.91% | 11.05% | -3.14% |