PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRTR vs. SWHRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRTR vs. SWHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares LifePath Retirement ETF (IRTR) and Schwab Target 2025 Fund (SWHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IRTR having a 4.55% return and SWHRX slightly higher at 4.71%.


IRTR

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.24%
YTD
4.55%
6M
4.41%
1Y
12.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SWHRX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.59%
YTD
4.71%
6M
4.43%
1Y
12.73%
3Y*
11.00%
5Y*
5.10%
10Y*
7.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRTR vs. SWHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IRTR
iShares LifePath Retirement ETF
4.55%12.70%7.59%11.03%
SWHRX
Schwab Target 2025 Fund
4.71%12.70%8.78%9.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IRTR and SWHRX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023

0.94

The correlation between IRTR and SWHRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRTR vs. SWHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRTR
IRTR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IRTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IRTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRTR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SWHRX
SWHRX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SWHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SWHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRTR vs. SWHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares LifePath Retirement ETF (IRTR) and Schwab Target 2025 Fund (SWHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IRTRSWHRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.38

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.57

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.24

11.22

+0.02

IRTR vs. SWHRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the SWHRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRTR and SWHRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IRTR vs. SWHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRTR drawdown since its inception was -6.29%, smaller than the maximum SWHRX drawdown of -37.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRTR and SWHRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRTRSWHRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-37.97%

+31.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.82%

-5.18%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-0.45%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-5.32%

+4.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

1.18%

-0.07%

Volatility

IRTR vs. SWHRX - Volatility Comparison

iShares LifePath Retirement ETF (IRTR) and Schwab Target 2025 Fund (SWHRX) have volatilities of 2.52% and 2.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRTRSWHRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

2.57%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.29%

5.44%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.34%

6.60%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.11%

10.96%

-3.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.11%

10.52%

-3.41%

IRTR vs. SWHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRTR has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SWHRX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IRTR vs. SWHRX - Dividend Comparison

IRTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than SWHRX's 9.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IRTR
iShares LifePath Retirement ETF
3.01%3.03%3.03%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SWHRX
Schwab Target 2025 Fund
9.68%10.13%7.82%5.19%5.72%6.41%2.94%5.47%5.95%3.78%5.31%7.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, IRTR and SWHRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWHRX has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to IRTR (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRTR dropped -6.29% vs SWHRX's -37.97%.

SWHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRTR and SWHRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer