PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EAOM vs. AOA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


EAOMAOA
YTD Return8.11%14.90%
1Y Return14.50%22.27%
3Y Return (Ann)0.64%4.44%
Sharpe Ratio2.462.53
Sortino Ratio3.643.56
Omega Ratio1.461.47
Calmar Ratio1.413.40
Martin Ratio14.8916.66
Ulcer Index1.10%1.49%
Daily Std Dev6.66%9.81%
Max Drawdown-20.73%-28.38%
Current Drawdown-1.63%-1.22%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between EAOM and AOA is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

EAOM vs. AOA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, EAOM achieves a 8.11% return, which is significantly lower than AOA's 14.90% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.61%
6.42%
EAOM
AOA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EAOM vs. AOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than AOA's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF
Expense ratio chart for AOA: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for EAOM: current value at 0.18% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.18%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EAOM vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAOM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EAOM, currently valued at 2.46, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.46
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EAOM, currently valued at 3.64, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.64
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EAOM, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.46
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EAOM, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.41
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EAOM, currently valued at 14.89, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0014.89
AOA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AOA, currently valued at 2.53, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.53
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AOA, currently valued at 3.56, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.56
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AOA, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.47
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AOA, currently valued at 3.40, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.40
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AOA, currently valued at 16.66, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0016.66

EAOM vs. AOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the AOA Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOM and AOA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.46
2.53
EAOM
AOA

Dividends

EAOM vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison

EAOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than AOA's 2.10% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
2.83%2.70%1.93%1.32%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF
2.10%2.22%2.10%1.67%1.71%2.50%2.37%5.09%2.02%2.15%2.18%1.84%

Drawdowns

EAOM vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOM drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, smaller than the maximum AOA drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOM and AOA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.63%
-1.22%
EAOM
AOA

Volatility

EAOM vs. AOA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) is 1.77%, while iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) has a volatility of 2.64%. This indicates that EAOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.77%
2.64%
EAOM
AOA