IRFIX vs. MLOZX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX) and Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX).
IRFIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Mar 30, 2005. MLOZX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Dec 19, 2013.
Performance
IRFIX vs. MLOZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IRFIX vs. MLOZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRFIX Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund | -4.81% | 23.52% | -10.56% | 4.58% | -23.84% | 7.66% | -0.81% | 23.74% | -3.74% | 23.38% |
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. | 27.86% | 17.35% | 12.16% | 10.49% | 21.10% | 39.09% | -26.70% | 12.62% | -13.43% | 0.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRFIX achieves a -4.81% return, which is significantly lower than MLOZX's 27.86% return. Over the past 10 years, IRFIX has underperformed MLOZX with an annualized return of 2.52%, while MLOZX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.89% annualized return.
IRFIX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -14.45%
- YTD
- -4.81%
- 6M
- -3.48%
- 1Y
- 14.38%
- 3Y*
- 3.81%
- 5Y*
- -2.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.52%
MLOZX
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 7.55%
- YTD
- 27.86%
- 6M
- 33.46%
- 1Y
- 50.75%
- 3Y*
- 22.70%
- 5Y*
- 21.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IRFIX vs. MLOZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRFIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than MLOZX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IRFIX vs. MLOZX — Risk / Return Rank
IRFIX
MLOZX
IRFIX vs. MLOZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX) and Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IRFIX | MLOZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 2.59 | -1.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 3.10 | -1.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.51 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 3.05 | -2.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.90 | 13.54 | -9.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IRFIX | MLOZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 2.59 | -1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 1.17 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.49 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.27 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between IRFIX and MLOZX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IRFIX vs. MLOZX - Dividend Comparison
IRFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, more than MLOZX's 1.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRFIX Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund | 6.48% | 6.17% | 3.24% | 2.62% | 2.62% | 7.70% | 3.40% | 9.81% | 4.19% | 3.37% | 6.46% | 3.36% |
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. | 1.09% | 1.71% | 10.24% | 4.61% | 3.66% | 3.08% | 6.57% | 6.21% | 4.44% | 3.86% | 3.72% | 6.05% |
Drawdowns
IRFIX vs. MLOZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRFIX drawdown since its inception was -70.13%, roughly equal to the maximum MLOZX drawdown of -72.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRFIX and MLOZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRFIX | MLOZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.13% | -72.01% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.85% | -16.08% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.41% | -20.84% | -17.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.51% | -64.94% | +25.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.71% | -0.56% | -20.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.69% | -20.92% | +2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 3.62% | -0.33% |
Volatility
IRFIX vs. MLOZX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) at 4.54%. This indicates that IRFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLOZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IRFIX | MLOZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 4.54% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.13% | 10.97% | -1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.55% | 20.02% | -6.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.12% | 18.26% | -3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 24.17% | -8.58% |