IRFIX vs. ARIIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX) and AB Global Real Estate Investment Fund II (ARIIX).
IRFIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Mar 30, 2005. ARIIX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Dec 8, 1997.
Performance
IRFIX vs. ARIIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IRFIX vs. ARIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRFIX Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund | -4.81% | 23.52% | -10.56% | 4.58% | -23.84% | 7.66% | -0.81% | 23.74% | -3.74% | 23.38% |
ARIIX AB Global Real Estate Investment Fund II | -0.74% | 10.49% | 2.89% | 12.50% | -25.35% | 26.57% | -4.62% | 23.44% | -4.31% | 14.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRFIX achieves a -4.81% return, which is significantly lower than ARIIX's -0.74% return. Over the past 10 years, IRFIX has underperformed ARIIX with an annualized return of 2.52%, while ARIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.34% annualized return.
IRFIX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -14.45%
- YTD
- -4.81%
- 6M
- -3.48%
- 1Y
- 14.38%
- 3Y*
- 3.81%
- 5Y*
- -2.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.52%
ARIIX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -10.68%
- YTD
- -0.74%
- 6M
- -0.65%
- 1Y
- 7.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.30%
- 5Y*
- 2.60%
- 10Y*
- 4.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IRFIX vs. ARIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRFIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than ARIIX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IRFIX vs. ARIIX — Risk / Return Rank
IRFIX
ARIIX
IRFIX vs. ARIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX) and AB Global Real Estate Investment Fund II (ARIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IRFIX | ARIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 0.57 | +0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 0.86 | +0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.12 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 0.74 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.90 | 2.92 | +0.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IRFIX | ARIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 0.57 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.16 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.25 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.33 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between IRFIX and ARIIX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IRFIX vs. ARIIX - Dividend Comparison
IRFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, more than ARIIX's 3.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRFIX Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund | 6.48% | 6.17% | 3.24% | 2.62% | 2.62% | 7.70% | 3.40% | 9.81% | 4.19% | 3.37% | 6.46% | 3.36% |
ARIIX AB Global Real Estate Investment Fund II | 3.71% | 3.77% | 2.99% | 3.34% | 5.98% | 4.38% | 1.54% | 8.58% | 4.72% | 5.59% | 5.20% | 3.45% |
Drawdowns
IRFIX vs. ARIIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRFIX drawdown since its inception was -70.13%, roughly equal to the maximum ARIIX drawdown of -70.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRFIX and ARIIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRFIX | ARIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.13% | -70.35% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.85% | -10.76% | -4.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.41% | -33.83% | -4.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.51% | -42.30% | +2.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.71% | -10.68% | -10.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.69% | -12.84% | -5.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 2.72% | +0.57% |
Volatility
IRFIX vs. ARIIX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to AB Global Real Estate Investment Fund II (ARIIX) at 4.32%. This indicates that IRFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IRFIX | ARIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 4.32% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.13% | 8.19% | +0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.55% | 14.18% | -0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.12% | 16.24% | -1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 17.59% | -2.00% |