PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRFIX vs. RNP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRFIX vs. RNP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX) and Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRFIX achieves a -2.08% return, which is significantly lower than RNP's 5.10% return. Over the past 10 years, IRFIX has underperformed RNP with an annualized return of 2.54%, while RNP has yielded a comparatively higher 8.37% annualized return.


IRFIX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-2.51%
YTD
-2.08%
6M
-0.78%
1Y
3.47%
3Y*
4.52%
5Y*
-3.39%
10Y*
2.54%

RNP

1D
1.01%
1M
-2.78%
YTD
5.10%
6M
7.04%
1Y
-2.00%
3Y*
12.15%
5Y*
3.08%
10Y*
8.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRFIX vs. RNP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IRFIX
Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund
-2.08%23.52%-10.56%4.58%-23.84%7.66%-0.81%23.74%-3.74%23.38%
RNP
Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc.
5.10%2.57%11.88%7.73%-19.95%32.84%3.31%43.14%-9.46%19.65%

Correlation

The correlation between IRFIX and RNP is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2005

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRFIX vs. RNP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRFIX
IRFIX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
IRFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
IRFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

RNP
RNP Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
RNP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNP Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
RNP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNP Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRFIX vs. RNP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX) and Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IRFIXRNPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.99

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

-0.16

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.63

-0.36

+0.99

IRFIX vs. RNP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRFIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is higher than the RNP Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRFIX and RNP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IRFIX vs. RNP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRFIX drawdown since its inception was -70.13%, smaller than the maximum RNP drawdown of -86.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRFIX and RNP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRFIXRNPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.13%

-86.93%

+16.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.85%

-12.24%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.06%

-19.71%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.24%

-36.19%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.51%

-56.68%

+17.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.43%

-5.67%

-12.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.65%

-13.11%

-5.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.36%

5.50%

-0.14%

Volatility

IRFIX vs. RNP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX) is 3.57%, while Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that IRFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRFIXRNPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

4.89%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.98%

10.23%

+0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.19%

13.27%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.34%

20.84%

-5.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.67%

24.26%

-8.59%

Dividends

IRFIX vs. RNP - Dividend Comparison

IRFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, less than RNP's 8.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IRFIX
Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund
6.30%6.17%3.24%2.62%2.62%7.70%3.40%9.81%4.19%3.37%6.46%3.36%
RNP
Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc.
8.13%8.22%7.81%8.10%13.26%5.20%6.52%6.25%8.36%7.00%7.75%8.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


IRFIX and RNP have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNP has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to IRFIX (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRFIX dropped -70.13% vs RNP's -86.93%.

IRFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRFIX and RNP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer