IRFIX vs. FSRNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX) and Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX).
IRFIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Mar 30, 2005. FSRNX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI US IMI Real Estate 25/25 Index. It was launched on Aug 9, 2011.
Performance
IRFIX vs. FSRNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IRFIX vs. FSRNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRFIX Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund | -4.81% | 23.52% | -10.56% | 4.58% | -23.84% | 7.66% | -0.81% | 23.74% | -3.74% | 23.38% |
FSRNX Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund | -0.56% | 3.03% | 4.99% | 11.93% | -26.14% | 40.66% | -11.31% | 23.78% | -4.91% | 3.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRFIX achieves a -4.81% return, which is significantly lower than FSRNX's -0.56% return. Over the past 10 years, IRFIX has underperformed FSRNX with an annualized return of 2.52%, while FSRNX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.12% annualized return.
IRFIX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -14.45%
- YTD
- -4.81%
- 6M
- -3.48%
- 1Y
- 14.38%
- 3Y*
- 3.81%
- 5Y*
- -2.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.52%
FSRNX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -7.86%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- -3.07%
- 1Y
- -0.02%
- 3Y*
- 5.74%
- 5Y*
- 2.79%
- 10Y*
- 3.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IRFIX vs. FSRNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRFIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRNX's 0.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IRFIX vs. FSRNX — Risk / Return Rank
IRFIX
FSRNX
IRFIX vs. FSRNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX) and Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IRFIX | FSRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 0.05 | +0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 0.19 | +1.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.03 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 0.06 | +0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.90 | 0.24 | +3.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IRFIX | FSRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 0.05 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.15 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.15 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.32 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between IRFIX and FSRNX is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IRFIX vs. FSRNX - Dividend Comparison
IRFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, more than FSRNX's 2.79% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRFIX Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund | 6.48% | 6.17% | 3.24% | 2.62% | 2.62% | 7.70% | 3.40% | 9.81% | 4.19% | 3.37% | 6.46% | 3.36% |
FSRNX Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund | 2.79% | 2.77% | 2.86% | 2.84% | 2.66% | 1.25% | 3.33% | 4.52% | 3.62% | 2.27% | 3.40% | 2.57% |
Drawdowns
IRFIX vs. FSRNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRFIX drawdown since its inception was -70.13%, which is greater than FSRNX's maximum drawdown of -44.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRFIX and FSRNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRFIX | FSRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.13% | -44.26% | -25.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.85% | -12.45% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.41% | -34.27% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.51% | -44.26% | +4.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.71% | -11.07% | -9.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.69% | -9.77% | -8.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 3.18% | +0.11% |
Volatility
IRFIX vs. FSRNX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX) at 4.21%. This indicates that IRFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IRFIX | FSRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 4.21% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.13% | 9.20% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.55% | 16.38% | -2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.12% | 18.89% | -3.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 21.41% | -5.82% |