IQMM vs. NOBL
IQMM (ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQMM is a Money Market fund actively managed by ProShares, while NOBL is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. IQMM is actively managed, while NOBL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. IQMM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
IQMM vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IQMM
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NOBL
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 3.45%
- 1Y
- 9.00%
- 3Y*
- 8.01%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.51%
IQMM vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IQMM ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF | 0.98% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | -4.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQMM and NOBL is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026 | -0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQMM vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
IQMM
NOBL
IQMM vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF (IQMM) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQMM | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 16.18 | 0.64 | +15.54 |
Drawdowns
IQMM vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQMM drawdown since its inception was -0.02%, smaller than the maximum NOBL drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQMM and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQMM | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.02% | -35.43% | +35.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.00% | -5.99% | +5.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -3.48% | +3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.50% | — |
Volatility
IQMM vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQMM | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22% | 11.33% | -11.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.22% | 14.38% | -14.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.22% | 16.60% | -16.38% |
IQMM vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQMM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQMM vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
IQMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than NOBL's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQMM ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF | 0.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.12% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQMM and NOBL have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IQMM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQMM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.
NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.94% for IQMM.
IQMM is categorized as Money Market, while NOBL is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IQMM and 0.35% for NOBL.
Find the right allocation for IQMM and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer