IQM vs. LVHD
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD).
IQM and LVHD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IQM is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020. LVHD is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index. It was launched on Dec 29, 2015.
Performance
IQM vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IQM vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 3.20% | 30.76% | 31.03% | 41.06% | -33.36% | 25.18% | 78.48% |
LVHD Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 6.73% | 7.50% | 10.18% | -0.95% | -1.82% | 26.90% | 8.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQM achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 6.73% return.
IQM
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -3.98%
- YTD
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 57.05%
- 3Y*
- 26.96%
- 5Y*
- 15.40%
- 10Y*
- —
LVHD
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- YTD
- 6.73%
- 6M
- 5.06%
- 1Y
- 7.56%
- 3Y*
- 8.47%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- 8.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IQM vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IQM vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank
IQM
LVHD
IQM vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQM | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | 0.63 | +1.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.33 | 0.95 | +1.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.13 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 0.85 | +3.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.47 | 3.03 | +9.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQM | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 0.63 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.59 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.57 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between IQM and LVHD is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IQM vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison
IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LVHD Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 3.20% | 3.35% | 4.23% | 3.55% | 3.30% | 2.56% | 3.27% | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.33% | 2.48% |
Drawdowns
IQM vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQM drawdown since its inception was -44.91%, which is greater than LVHD's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQM and LVHD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQM | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.91% | -37.32% | -7.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.71% | -8.38% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.91% | -16.75% | -28.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.86% | -4.83% | -2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.55% | -4.05% | -8.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.72% | 2.39% | +2.33% |
Volatility
IQM vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a higher volatility of 12.71% compared to Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) at 2.77%. This indicates that IQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IQM | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.71% | 2.77% | +9.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.53% | 6.49% | +17.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.40% | 11.99% | +21.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.67% | 12.87% | +15.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.73% | 15.49% | +15.24% |