IPOS vs. HDV
IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IPOS is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Renaissance International IPO Index, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IPOS returned 2.99%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for HDV. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IPOS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
IPOS vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPOS achieves a 41.26% return, which is significantly higher than HDV's 19.66% return. Over the past 10 years, IPOS has underperformed HDV with an annualized return of 2.99%, while HDV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.57% annualized return.
IPOS
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- 6M
- 26.12%
- YTD
- 41.26%
- 1Y
- 56.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.21%
- 5Y*
- -5.77%
- 10Y*
- 2.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.17%
HDV
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 7.30%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 24.30%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- 12.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $205.70M | $171.89M | $116.16M | |
| $97.07K | $70.55K | $103.47K |
IPOS vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 41.26% | 39.93% | -12.34% | -16.49% | -33.46% | -30.62% | 50.71% | 30.93% | -22.33% | 36.83% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 19.66% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPOS and HDV is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2014 | 0.27 |
The correlation between IPOS and HDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.28 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IPOS vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IPOS
HDV
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
IPOS
HDV
Healthcare
IPOS
HDV
Industrials
IPOS
HDV
Financial Services
IPOS
HDV
Consumer Defensive
IPOS
HDV
Energy
IPOS
HDV
Basic Materials
IPOS
HDV
Consumer Cyclical
IPOS
HDV
Utilities
IPOS
HDV
Communication Services
IPOS
HDV
Real Estate
IPOS
-
HDV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPOS vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
IPOS
HDV
IPOS vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IPOS | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.40 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 4.71 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.35 | 12.85 | -4.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IPOS vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPOS drawdown since its inception was -73.09%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPOS and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPOS | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.09% | -37.04% | -36.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.27% | -5.18% | -13.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.19% | -10.49% | -20.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.38% | -15.42% | -51.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.09% | -37.04% | -36.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.97% | -1.72% | -38.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.10% | -3.06% | -29.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.74% | 1.90% | +4.84% |
Volatility
IPOS vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a higher volatility of 10.50% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 4.12%. This indicates that IPOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPOS | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.50% | 4.12% | +6.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.54% | 8.54% | +23.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.37% | 10.80% | +23.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.22% | 12.94% | +15.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.64% | 15.78% | +8.86% |
IPOS vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPOS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
IPOS vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
IPOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than HDV's 3.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 3.08% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 0.33% | 1.04% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.89% | 1.12% | 0.87% | 1.73% | 1.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IPOS and HDV have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IPOS has higher volatility (10.50%) compared to HDV (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPOS dropped -73.09% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 10-year performance, HDV leads with 9.57% vs 2.99% for IPOS. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HDV has performed better with a 9.57% return vs 2.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 0.33% for IPOS.
IPOS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while HDV is Dividend. IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Renaissance Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for IPOS and 0.08% for HDV.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IPOS and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer