IPOS vs. DBAW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) and DBAW (Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - IPOS tracks the Renaissance International IPO Index while DBAW tracks the MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IPOS returned 3.00%/yr vs 11.44%/yr for DBAW. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IPOS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DBAW.

Performance

IPOS vs. DBAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPOS achieves a 40.15% return, which is significantly higher than DBAW's 16.12% return. Over the past 10 years, IPOS has underperformed DBAW with an annualized return of 3.00%, while DBAW has yielded a comparatively higher 11.44% annualized return.

IPOS

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 10.58%
• YTD: 40.15%
• 6M: 44.26%
• 1Y: 65.50%
• 3Y*: 15.28%
• 5Y*: -7.69%
• 10Y*: 3.00%

DBAW

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 6.28%
• YTD: 16.12%
• 6M: 18.39%
• 1Y: 36.60%
• 3Y*: 21.15%
• 5Y*: 11.32%
• 10Y*: 11.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPOS vs. DBAW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF	40.15%	39.93%	-12.34%	-16.49%	-33.46%	-30.62%	50.71%	30.93%	-22.33%	36.83%
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF	16.12%	26.47%	14.35%	16.26%	-13.35%	13.08%	7.44%	22.96%	-10.38%	18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between IPOS and DBAW is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2014	0.52

The correlation between IPOS and DBAW shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IPOS vs. DBAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IPOS	DBAW
Technology	42.0%	18.7%
Healthcare	16.2%	7.2%
Industrials	15.0%	15.0%
Financial Services	9.6%	24.1%
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	7.9%
Basic Materials	5.3%	6.8%
Energy	4.9%	5.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	5.3%
Utilities	3.1%	3.2%
Communication Services	0.3%	5.0%
Real Estate	-	1.5%

Return for Risk

IPOS vs. DBAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPOS

IPOS Risk / Return Rank: 66
IPOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
IPOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
IPOS Omega Ratio Rank: 67
IPOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
IPOS Martin Ratio Rank: 63

DBAW

DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 84
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPOS vs. DBAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IPOS	DBAW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.86	-0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	3.90	-1.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.55	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.83	4.09	-0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.58	16.97	-5.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IPOS vs. DBAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPOS Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the DBAW Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPOS and DBAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IPOS	DBAW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	2.86	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.28	0.83	-1.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12	0.75	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.63	-0.54

Drawdowns

IPOS vs. DBAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPOS drawdown since its inception was -73.09%, which is greater than DBAW's maximum drawdown of -31.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPOS and DBAW.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPOS	DBAW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.09%	-31.44%	-41.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.17%	-9.00%	-8.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.08%	-14.11%	-19.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-69.93%	-17.87%	-52.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.09%	-31.44%	-41.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.44%	-0.51%	-39.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.99%	-5.00%	-26.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.67%	2.16%	+3.51%

Volatility

IPOS vs. DBAW - Volatility Comparison

Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a higher volatility of 12.05% compared to Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) at 4.71%. This indicates that IPOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IPOS	DBAW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.05%	4.71%	+7.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.45%	11.00%	+15.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.41%	12.88%	+16.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.19%	13.74%	+13.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.13%	15.28%	+8.85%

IPOS vs. DBAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPOS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DBAW's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPOS vs. DBAW - Dividend Comparison

IPOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than DBAW's 3.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF	3.29%	3.83%	1.70%	3.45%	8.81%	2.05%	2.08%	2.91%	2.93%	2.41%	1.99%	5.74%
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF	0.68%	1.04%	0.93%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.25%	0.89%	1.12%	0.87%	1.73%	1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IPOS and DBAW in my portfolio?

IPOS and DBAW have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IPOS or DBAW?

IPOS has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to DBAW (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPOS dropped -73.09% vs DBAW's -31.44%.

Which ETF is better, IPOS or DBAW?

On 10-year performance, DBAW leads with 11.44% vs 3.00% for IPOS. On fees, DBAW is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, DBAW has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IPOS or DBAW?

Over the 10-year period, DBAW has performed better with a 11.44% return vs 3.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IPOS or DBAW?

DBAW is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IPOS or DBAW?

DBAW has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 0.68% for IPOS.

What is the main difference between IPOS and DBAW?

IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index, while DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Renaissance Capital and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for IPOS and 0.41% for DBAW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.