IPO vs. VO
IPO (Renaissance IPO ETF) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IPO is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Renaissance IPO Index, while VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IPO returned 12.31%/yr vs 12.36%/yr for VO. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IPO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.
Performance
IPO vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPO achieves a 23.60% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 11.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IPO having a 12.31% annualized return and VO not far ahead at 12.36%.
IPO
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 23.60%
- 6M
- 20.33%
- 1Y
- 29.33%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- -2.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
VO
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 11.52%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 18.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.81%
- 10Y*
- 12.36%
IPO vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPO Renaissance IPO ETF | 23.60% | 5.45% | 15.68% | 52.55% | -57.26% | -10.31% | 107.88% | 34.11% | -17.24% | 37.16% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 11.52% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPO and VO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2013 | 0.73 |
The correlation between IPO and VO shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IPO vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IPO
VO
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Financial Services
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Technology
IPO
VO
Consumer Cyclical
IPO
VO
Healthcare
IPO
VO
Industrials
IPO
VO
Consumer Defensive
IPO
VO
Communication Services
IPO
VO
Financial Services
IPO
VO
Real Estate
IPO
VO
Energy
IPO
VO
Utilities
IPO
VO
Basic Materials
IPO
-
VO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPO vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank
IPO
VO
IPO vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IPO | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.26 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 2.30 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.51 | 8.66 | -6.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IPO vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPO drawdown since its inception was -68.76%, which is greater than VO's maximum drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPO and VO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPO | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.76% | -58.87% | -9.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.24% | -8.17% | -18.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.04% | -19.02% | -13.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.02% | -27.57% | -38.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.76% | -39.37% | -29.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.32% | -0.25% | -25.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.93% | -7.84% | -15.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.73% | 2.16% | +9.57% |
Volatility
IPO vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) has a higher volatility of 11.36% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 4.41%. This indicates that IPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPO | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.36% | 4.41% | +6.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.64% | 9.83% | +13.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.25% | 12.76% | +17.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.08% | 17.66% | +18.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.60% | 18.92% | +12.68% |
IPO vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
IPO vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
IPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than VO's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPO Renaissance IPO ETF | 0.42% | 0.66% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.26% | 0.49% | 0.43% | 0.40% | 0.11% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.34% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IPO and VO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IPO has higher volatility (11.36%) compared to VO (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPO dropped -68.76% vs VO's -58.87%.
On 10-year performance, VO leads with 12.36% vs 12.31% for IPO. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 12.36% return vs 12.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IPO.
VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.42% for IPO.
IPO is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while VO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. IPO tracks Renaissance IPO Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Renaissance Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IPO and 0.03% for VO.
VO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IPO and VO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer