IPO vs. FPX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

IPO (Renaissance IPO ETF) and FPX (First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IPO is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Renaissance IPO Index, while FPX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IPOX-100 U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IPO returned 10.14%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for FPX. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IPO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for FPX.

Performance

IPO vs. FPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) and First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPO achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly higher than FPX's 8.51% return. Over the past 10 years, IPO has underperformed FPX with an annualized return of 10.14%, while FPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.50% annualized return.

IPO

• 1D: -2.11%
• 1M: -11.04%
• 6M: 14.70%
• YTD: 12.19%
• 1Y: 12.44%
• 3Y*: 12.56%
• 5Y*: -3.83%
• 10Y*: 10.14%
• ALL TIME*: 8.05%

FPX

• 1D: -1.38%
• 1M: -9.10%
• 6M: 8.46%
• YTD: 8.51%
• 1Y: 19.55%
• 3Y*: 23.96%
• 5Y*: 7.39%
• 10Y*: 13.50%
• ALL TIME*: 12.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF	$11.19M	$11.53M	$10.30M
IPO Renaissance IPO ETF	$994.90K	$1.09M	$2.23M

IPO vs. FPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IPO Renaissance IPO ETF	12.19%	5.45%	15.68%	52.55%	-57.26%	-10.31%	107.88%	34.11%	-17.24%	37.16%
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF	8.51%	37.62%	24.75%	22.26%	-35.11%	3.69%	47.89%	30.37%	-8.35%	27.03%

Correlation

The correlation between IPO and FPX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2013	0.85

The correlation between IPO and FPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

IPO vs. FPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IPO	FPX
Technology	43.6%	33.7%
Healthcare	13.0%	15.4%
Industrials	12.5%	20.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	5.6%
Communication Services	6.6%	7.2%
Financial Services	6.3%	4.8%
Real Estate	4.1%	2.6%
Energy	3.1%	3.5%
Utilities	0.9%	1.4%
Consumer Defensive	0.3%	2.5%
Basic Materials	-	2.4%

Return for Risk

IPO vs. FPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IPO

IPO Risk / Return Rank: 19
IPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
IPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
IPO Omega Ratio Rank: 19
IPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
IPO Martin Ratio Rank: 17

FPX

FPX Risk / Return Rank: 30
FPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
FPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
FPX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
FPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FPX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IPO vs. FPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) and First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IPO	FPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	0.66	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.73	1.04	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.13	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.45	1.06	-0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.97	3.58	-2.61

IPO vs. FPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPO Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the FPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPO and FPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IPO vs. FPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPO drawdown since its inception was -68.76%, which is greater than FPX's maximum drawdown of -56.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPO and FPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPO	FPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.76%	-56.29%	-12.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.24%	-16.29%	-9.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.04%	-30.88%	-1.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.02%	-43.14%	-22.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-68.76%	-43.14%	-25.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.21%	-13.94%	-18.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.97%	-11.29%	-11.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.07%	4.80%	+7.27%

Volatility

IPO vs. FPX - Volatility Comparison

Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) has a higher volatility of 10.31% compared to First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) at 9.65%. This indicates that IPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IPO	FPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.31%	9.65%	+0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.49%	20.96%	+4.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.90%	26.29%	+5.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.26%	27.10%	+9.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.74%	24.60%	+7.14%

IPO vs. FPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FPX's 0.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPO vs. FPX - Dividend Comparison

IPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than FPX's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF	0.48%	0.53%	0.09%	0.27%	1.08%	0.14%	0.28%	0.67%	0.88%	0.68%	0.77%	0.62%
IPO Renaissance IPO ETF	0.46%	0.66%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.10%	0.26%	0.49%	0.43%	0.40%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IPO and FPX in my portfolio?

IPO and FPX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IPO or FPX?

IPO has higher volatility (10.31%) compared to FPX (9.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPO dropped -68.76% vs FPX's -56.29%.

Which ETF is better, IPO or FPX?

On 10-year performance, FPX leads with 13.50% vs 10.14% for IPO. On fees, FPX is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, FPX has been the lower-risk option at 9.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IPO or FPX?

Over the 10-year period, FPX has performed better with a 13.50% return vs 10.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IPO or FPX?

FPX is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IPO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IPO or FPX?

FPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.46% for IPO.

What is the main difference between IPO and FPX?

IPO is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while FPX is Large Cap Growth Equities. IPO tracks Renaissance IPO Index, while FPX tracks IPOX-100 U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Renaissance Capital and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IPO and 0.57% for FPX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.