PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPO vs. IPOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPO vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPO achieves a 29.28% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 55.22% return. Over the past 10 years, IPO has outperformed IPOS with an annualized return of 12.40%, while IPOS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.56% annualized return.


IPO

1D
-1.01%
1M
11.14%
YTD
29.28%
6M
23.90%
1Y
36.21%
3Y*
24.13%
5Y*
-1.92%
10Y*
12.40%

IPOS

1D
1.85%
1M
21.21%
YTD
55.22%
6M
53.61%
1Y
87.31%
3Y*
21.89%
5Y*
-5.55%
10Y*
4.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPO vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPO
Renaissance IPO ETF
29.28%5.45%15.68%52.55%-57.26%-10.31%107.88%34.11%-17.24%37.16%
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
55.22%39.93%-12.34%-16.49%-33.46%-30.62%50.71%30.93%-22.33%36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between IPO and IPOS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2014

0.45

The correlation between IPO and IPOS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

IPO vs. IPOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPO
IPOS

Technology

46.6%
50.2%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
6.3%

Healthcare

8.9%
14.9%

Industrials

8.8%
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.8%
4.2%

Communication Services

6.7%
0.3%

Financial Services

4.4%
7.3%

Real Estate

3.5%

-

Energy

0.9%
4.9%

Utilities

0.2%
3.1%

Basic Materials

-

3.8%

Technology

IPO
46.6%
IPOS
50.2%

Consumer Cyclical

IPO
12.2%
IPOS
6.3%

Healthcare

IPO
8.9%
IPOS
14.9%

Industrials

IPO
8.8%
IPOS
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

IPO
7.8%
IPOS
4.2%

Communication Services

IPO
6.7%
IPOS
0.3%

Financial Services

IPO
4.4%
IPOS
7.3%

Real Estate

IPO
3.5%
IPOS

-

Energy

IPO
0.9%
IPOS
4.9%

Utilities

IPO
0.2%
IPOS
3.1%

Basic Materials

IPO

-

IPOS
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPO vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPO
IPO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
IPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

IPOS
IPOS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IPOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPOS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IPOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPOS Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPO vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IPOIPOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.47

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

5.11

-3.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.10

15.32

-12.23

IPO vs. IPOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPO Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the IPOS Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPO and IPOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IPO vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPO drawdown since its inception was -68.76%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPO and IPOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPOIPOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.76%

-73.09%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.24%

-17.17%

-9.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.04%

-34.08%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.02%

-69.93%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.76%

-73.09%

+4.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.89%

-34.04%

+12.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.93%

-32.01%

+9.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.72%

5.72%

+6.00%

Volatility

IPO vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) is 10.97%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 14.82%. This indicates that IPO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPOIPOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.97%

14.82%

-3.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.55%

29.53%

-5.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.18%

32.20%

-2.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.06%

27.87%

+8.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.62%

24.42%

+7.20%

IPO vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPO vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison

IPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, more than IPOS's 0.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPO
Renaissance IPO ETF
0.40%0.66%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.26%0.49%0.43%0.40%0.11%
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
0.30%1.04%0.93%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.25%0.89%1.12%0.87%1.73%1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPO and IPOS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPOS has higher volatility (14.82%) compared to IPO (10.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPO dropped -68.76% vs IPOS's -73.09%.

On 10-year performance, IPO leads with 12.40% vs 4.56% for IPOS. On fees, IPO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, IPO has been the lower-risk option at 10.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IPO has performed better with a 12.40% return vs 4.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IPO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.

IPO has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.30% for IPOS.

IPO is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while IPOS is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IPO tracks Renaissance IPO Index, while IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IPO and 0.80% for IPOS.

IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPO and IPOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer