IPO vs. IPOS
IPO (Renaissance IPO ETF) and IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IPO is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Renaissance IPO Index, while IPOS is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Renaissance International IPO Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IPO returned 12.40%/yr vs 4.56%/yr for IPOS. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IPO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for IPOS.
Performance
IPO vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPO achieves a 29.28% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 55.22% return. Over the past 10 years, IPO has outperformed IPOS with an annualized return of 12.40%, while IPOS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.56% annualized return.
IPO
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 11.14%
- YTD
- 29.28%
- 6M
- 23.90%
- 1Y
- 36.21%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- -1.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
IPOS
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 21.21%
- YTD
- 55.22%
- 6M
- 53.61%
- 1Y
- 87.31%
- 3Y*
- 21.89%
- 5Y*
- -5.55%
- 10Y*
- 4.56%
IPO vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPO Renaissance IPO ETF | 29.28% | 5.45% | 15.68% | 52.55% | -57.26% | -10.31% | 107.88% | 34.11% | -17.24% | 37.16% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 55.22% | 39.93% | -12.34% | -16.49% | -33.46% | -30.62% | 50.71% | 30.93% | -22.33% | 36.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPO and IPOS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2014 | 0.45 |
The correlation between IPO and IPOS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
IPO vs. IPOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IPO
IPOS
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Technology
IPO
IPOS
Consumer Cyclical
IPO
IPOS
Healthcare
IPO
IPOS
Industrials
IPO
IPOS
Consumer Defensive
IPO
IPOS
Communication Services
IPO
IPOS
Financial Services
IPO
IPOS
Real Estate
IPO
IPOS
-
Energy
IPO
IPOS
Utilities
IPO
IPOS
Basic Materials
IPO
-
IPOS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPO vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank
IPO
IPOS
IPO vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IPO | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.47 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 5.11 | -3.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.10 | 15.32 | -12.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IPO vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPO drawdown since its inception was -68.76%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPO and IPOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPO | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.76% | -73.09% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.24% | -17.17% | -9.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.04% | -34.08% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.02% | -69.93% | +3.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.76% | -73.09% | +4.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.89% | -34.04% | +12.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.93% | -32.01% | +9.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.72% | 5.72% | +6.00% |
Volatility
IPO vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) is 10.97%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 14.82%. This indicates that IPO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPO | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.97% | 14.82% | -3.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.55% | 29.53% | -5.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.18% | 32.20% | -2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.06% | 27.87% | +8.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.62% | 24.42% | +7.20% |
IPO vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
IPO vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison
IPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, more than IPOS's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPO Renaissance IPO ETF | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.26% | 0.49% | 0.43% | 0.40% | 0.11% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 0.30% | 1.04% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.89% | 1.12% | 0.87% | 1.73% | 1.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IPO and IPOS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IPOS has higher volatility (14.82%) compared to IPO (10.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPO dropped -68.76% vs IPOS's -73.09%.
On 10-year performance, IPO leads with 12.40% vs 4.56% for IPOS. On fees, IPO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, IPO has been the lower-risk option at 10.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IPO has performed better with a 12.40% return vs 4.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IPO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.
IPO has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.30% for IPOS.
IPO is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while IPOS is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IPO tracks Renaissance IPO Index, while IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IPO and 0.80% for IPOS.
IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IPO and IPOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer