IPAY vs. HACK
Compare and contrast key facts about ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK).
IPAY and HACK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IPAY is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Mobile Payments Index. It was launched on Jul 15, 2015. HACK is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Cyber Defense Index. It was launched on Nov 11, 2014. Both IPAY and HACK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IPAY vs. HACK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IPAY vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF | -18.32% | -9.55% | 25.88% | 18.21% | -32.38% | -12.72% | 34.22% | 41.80% | 0.17% | 36.34% |
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | -5.23% | 7.97% | 23.49% | 37.44% | -28.16% | 7.03% | 41.51% | 23.39% | 6.61% | 19.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPAY achieves a -18.32% return, which is significantly lower than HACK's -5.23% return. Over the past 10 years, IPAY has underperformed HACK with an annualized return of 6.04%, while HACK has yielded a comparatively higher 12.73% annualized return.
IPAY
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -6.81%
- YTD
- -18.32%
- 6M
- -25.05%
- 1Y
- -20.22%
- 3Y*
- 1.18%
- 5Y*
- -8.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.04%
HACK
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- -5.23%
- 6M
- -12.47%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- 12.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IPAY vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPAY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IPAY vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank
IPAY
HACK
IPAY vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IPAY | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | 0.21 | -0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | 0.47 | -1.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.06 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 0.30 | -0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.48 | 0.79 | -2.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IPAY | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.74 | 0.21 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | 0.29 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.56 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.47 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between IPAY and HACK is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IPAY vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison
IPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than HACK's 0.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF | 0.97% | 0.79% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.14% | 0.20% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% |
Drawdowns
IPAY vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPAY drawdown since its inception was -51.75%, which is greater than HACK's maximum drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAY and HACK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPAY | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.75% | -42.68% | -9.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.31% | -20.67% | -10.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.75% | -38.68% | -13.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.75% | -38.68% | -13.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.87% | -14.52% | -26.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.36% | -11.70% | -4.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.18% | 7.81% | +5.37% |
Volatility
IPAY vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) is 7.12%, while ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) has a volatility of 8.14%. This indicates that IPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HACK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IPAY | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | 8.14% | -1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.91% | 17.10% | +0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.49% | 26.04% | +1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.79% | 23.31% | +2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.19% | 22.85% | +2.34% |