IPAY vs. ARKF
IPAY (ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF) and ARKF (ARK Fintech Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IPAY is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Prime Mobile Payments Index, while ARKF is a Blockchain fund actively managed by ARK. IPAY is passively managed, while ARKF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IPAY returned -5.73%/yr vs -4.94%/yr for ARKF. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
IPAY vs. ARKF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPAY achieves a -2.46% return, which is significantly higher than ARKF's -14.89% return.
IPAY
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 4.88%
- 6M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- -2.46%
- 1Y
- -9.51%
- 3Y*
- 6.01%
- 5Y*
- -5.73%
- 10Y*
- 7.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.67%
ARKF
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- 6M
- -4.84%
- YTD
- -14.89%
- 1Y
- -20.38%
- 3Y*
- 22.73%
- 5Y*
- -4.94%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.22M | $5.36M | $7.06M | |
| $3.69M | $3.96M | $2.49M |
IPAY vs. ARKF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF | -2.46% | -9.55% | 25.88% | 18.21% | -32.38% | -12.72% | 34.22% | 26.95% |
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF | -14.89% | 28.67% | 34.34% | 93.27% | -65.07% | -17.82% | 108.03% | 20.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPAY and ARKF is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2019 | 0.82 |
The correlation between IPAY and ARKF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
IPAY vs. ARKF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IPAY
ARKF
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IPAY
ARKF
Financial Services
IPAY
ARKF
Industrials
IPAY
ARKF
-
Basic Materials
IPAY
-
ARKF
-
Communication Services
IPAY
-
ARKF
Consumer Cyclical
IPAY
-
ARKF
Consumer Defensive
IPAY
-
ARKF
-
Energy
IPAY
-
ARKF
-
Healthcare
IPAY
-
ARKF
Real Estate
IPAY
-
ARKF
-
Utilities
IPAY
-
ARKF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPAY vs. ARKF — Risk / Return Rank
IPAY
ARKF
IPAY vs. ARKF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IPAY | ARKF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.92 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | -0.53 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | -0.85 | +0.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IPAY vs. ARKF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPAY drawdown since its inception was -51.75%, smaller than the maximum ARKF drawdown of -78.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAY and ARKF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPAY | ARKF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.75% | -78.63% | +26.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.88% | -38.50% | +7.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.74% | -38.50% | +5.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.49% | -75.30% | +23.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.38% | -36.20% | +6.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.93% | -34.98% | +18.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.21% | 23.90% | -5.69% |
Volatility
IPAY vs. ARKF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) is 7.11%, while ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) has a volatility of 8.61%. This indicates that IPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPAY | ARKF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.11% | 8.61% | -1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.94% | 26.06% | -6.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.73% | 33.79% | -9.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.33% | 43.01% | -16.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.43% | 39.62% | -14.19% |
IPAY vs. ARKF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IPAY and ARKF have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
IPAY vs. ARKF - Dividend Comparison
IPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, more than ARKF's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF | 0.11% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 1.25% |
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF | 0.81% | 0.79% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IPAY and ARKF have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKF has higher volatility (8.61%) compared to IPAY (7.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPAY dropped -51.75% vs ARKF's -78.63%.
On 5-year performance, ARKF leads with -4.94% vs -5.73% for IPAY. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, IPAY has been the lower-risk option at 7.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ARKF has performed better with a -4.94% return vs -5.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IPAY and ARKF have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
IPAY has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.11% for ARKF.
IPAY is categorized as Technology Equities, while ARKF is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and ARK.
IPAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.39 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IPAY and ARKF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer