PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPAY vs. BPAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IPAY vs. BPAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IPAY vs. BPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IPAY
ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF
-17.75%-9.55%25.88%18.21%-15.35%
BPAY
BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF
-18.58%8.54%17.28%13.19%-16.39%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IPAY having a -17.75% return and BPAY slightly lower at -18.58%.


IPAY

1D
2.51%
1M
-5.29%
YTD
-17.75%
6M
-24.46%
1Y
-18.94%
3Y*
1.41%
5Y*
-8.65%
10Y*
6.12%

BPAY

1D
3.03%
1M
-6.21%
YTD
-18.58%
6M
-26.92%
1Y
-3.62%
3Y*
8.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IPAY vs. BPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPAY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BPAY's 0.70% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IPAY vs. BPAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPAY
IPAY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BPAY
BPAY Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
BPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPAY vs. BPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPAYBPAYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.69

-0.12

-0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.84

0.03

-0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.00

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

-0.12

-0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.45

-0.30

-1.16

IPAY vs. BPAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPAY Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the BPAY Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPAY and BPAY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPAYBPAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.69

-0.12

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

-0.02

+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between IPAY and BPAY is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IPAY vs. BPAY - Dividend Comparison

IPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than BPAY's 7.97% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
IPAY
ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF
0.96%0.79%0.77%0.00%0.00%
BPAY
BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF
7.97%6.49%0.48%1.18%0.18%

Drawdowns

IPAY vs. BPAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPAY drawdown since its inception was -51.75%, which is greater than BPAY's maximum drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAY and BPAY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IPAYBPAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.75%

-33.62%

-18.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.31%

-33.62%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.45%

-31.22%

-9.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.35%

-9.86%

-6.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.05%

13.63%

-0.58%

Volatility

IPAY vs. BPAY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) is 7.11%, while BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) has a volatility of 7.93%. This indicates that IPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IPAYBPAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.11%

7.93%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.96%

19.05%

-1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.48%

29.28%

-1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.81%

24.20%

+1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.19%

24.20%

+0.99%