INUV vs. TGB

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Inuvo, Inc. (INUV) and Taseko Mines Limited (TGB).

Performance

INUV vs. TGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inuvo, Inc. (INUV) and Taseko Mines Limited (TGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

INUV vs. TGB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INUV Inuvo, Inc.	-13.71%	-61.63%	52.09%	91.87%	-58.21%	17.02%	50.97%	-71.96%	32.10%	-51.50%
TGB Taseko Mines Limited	19.61%	191.75%	38.57%	-4.76%	-28.29%	55.30%	175.00%	1.48%	-79.70%	173.38%

Fundamentals

Market Cap INUV : $31.30M TGB : $2.37B
EPS INUV : -$0.35 TGB : -$0.09
PS Ratio INUV : 0.36 TGB : 3.31
PB Ratio INUV : 3.12 TGB : 3.05
Total Revenue (TTM) INUV : $86.21M TGB : $672.90M
Gross Profit (TTM) INUV : $64.21M TGB : $175.15M
EBITDA (TTM) INUV : -$5.57M TGB : $159.70M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INUV achieves a -13.71% return, which is significantly lower than TGB's 19.61% return. Over the past 10 years, INUV has underperformed TGB with an annualized return of -19.62%, while TGB has yielded a comparatively higher 28.81% annualized return.

INUV

• 1D: 3.38%
• 1M: -32.92%
• YTD: -13.71%
• 6M: -38.68%
• 1Y: -41.37%
• 3Y*: -9.81%
• 5Y*: -26.83%
• 10Y*: -19.62%

TGB

• 1D: 4.96%
• 1M: -22.72%
• YTD: 19.61%
• 6M: 61.58%
• 1Y: 195.63%
• 3Y*: 59.77%
• 5Y*: 30.19%
• 10Y*: 28.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

INUV vs. TGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INUV

INUV Risk / Return Rank: 24
INUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
INUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
INUV Omega Ratio Rank: 28
INUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
INUV Martin Ratio Rank: 24

TGB

TGB Risk / Return Rank: 94
TGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
TGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
TGB Omega Ratio Rank: 91
TGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
TGB Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INUV vs. TGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inuvo, Inc. (INUV) and Taseko Mines Limited (TGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INUV	TGB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.42	2.97	-3.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.05	3.15	-3.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.41	-0.42
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.55	5.70	-6.26
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.93	17.80	-18.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INUV vs. TGB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INUV Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the TGB Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INUV and TGB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INUV	TGB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.42	2.97	-3.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.31	0.48	-0.79
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.16	0.44	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	-0.02	-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between INUV and TGB is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

INUV vs. TGB - Dividend Comparison

Neither INUV nor TGB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

INUV vs. TGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INUV drawdown since its inception was -99.73%, roughly equal to the maximum TGB drawdown of -98.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INUV and TGB.

Drawdown Indicators

	INUV	TGB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.73%	-98.58%	-1.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-71.60%	-35.47%	-36.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-84.25%	-65.27%	-18.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-91.65%	-90.76%	-0.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.65%	-50.76%	-48.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.94%	-81.57%	-1.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	42.86%	11.36%	+31.50%

Volatility

INUV vs. TGB - Volatility Comparison

Inuvo, Inc. (INUV) has a higher volatility of 23.08% compared to Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) at 21.59%. This indicates that INUV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INUV	TGB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.08%	21.59%	+1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	77.72%	49.36%	+28.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	98.24%	66.40%	+31.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	86.67%	62.65%	+24.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	121.70%	65.92%	+55.78%

Financials

INUV vs. TGB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Inuvo, Inc. and Taseko Mines Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

INUV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Inuvo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 9.46M and revenue of 14.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.

TGB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 124.06M and revenue of 243.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.9%.

INUV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Inuvo, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.21M and revenue of 14.26M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.5%.

TGB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported an operating income of 111.93M and revenue of 243.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.9%.

INUV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Inuvo, Inc. reported a net income of -593.87K and revenue of 14.26M, resulting in a net margin of -4.2%.

TGB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported a net income of 4.45M and revenue of 243.77M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.