PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INUV vs. TGB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INUV vs. TGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inuvo, Inc. (INUV) and Taseko Mines Limited (TGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INUV achieves a -40.32% return, which is significantly lower than TGB's 34.81% return. Over the past 10 years, INUV has underperformed TGB with an annualized return of -21.75%, while TGB has yielded a comparatively higher 30.44% annualized return.


INUV

1D
1.37%
1M
-17.78%
YTD
-40.32%
6M
-48.43%
1Y
-61.59%
3Y*
-16.03%
5Y*
-28.44%
10Y*
-21.75%

TGB

1D
-1.93%
1M
11.55%
YTD
34.81%
6M
42.62%
1Y
208.91%
3Y*
75.98%
5Y*
25.61%
10Y*
30.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INUV vs. TGB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INUV
Inuvo, Inc.
-40.32%-61.63%52.09%91.87%-58.21%17.02%50.97%-71.96%32.10%-51.50%
TGB
Taseko Mines Limited
34.81%191.75%38.57%-4.76%-28.29%55.30%175.00%1.48%-79.70%173.38%

Correlation

The correlation between INUV and TGB is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 1998

0.07

The correlation between INUV and TGB shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INUV:

$22.05M

TGB:

$2.81B

EPS

INUV:

-$0.13

TGB:

$0.05

PS Ratio

INUV:

0.32

TGB:

3.36

PB Ratio

INUV:

1.81

TGB:

3.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

INUV:

$67.43M

TGB:

$768.31M

Gross Profit (TTM)

INUV:

$46.79M

TGB:

$240.15M

EBITDA (TTM)

INUV:

-$3.16M

TGB:

$244.74M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INUV vs. TGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INUV
INUV Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
INUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
INUV Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
INUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
INUV Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

TGB
TGB Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
TGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGB Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
TGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGB Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INUV vs. TGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inuvo, Inc. (INUV) and Taseko Mines Limited (TGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INUVTGBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.43

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

5.93

-6.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

16.28

-17.49

INUV vs. TGB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INUV Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the TGB Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INUV and TGB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INUVTGBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.63

3.23

-3.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

0.41

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.18

0.47

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

-0.02

-0.07

Drawdowns

INUV vs. TGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INUV drawdown since its inception was -99.77%, roughly equal to the maximum TGB drawdown of -98.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INUV and TGB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INUVTGBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.77%

-98.58%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-75.85%

-35.47%

-40.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-80.14%

-44.26%

-35.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.48%

-62.70%

-23.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.86%

-90.76%

-2.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.76%

-44.51%

-55.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-83.04%

-81.38%

-1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

51.03%

12.89%

+38.14%

Volatility

INUV vs. TGB - Volatility Comparison

Inuvo, Inc. (INUV) has a higher volatility of 29.34% compared to Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) at 22.39%. This indicates that INUV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INUVTGBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.34%

22.39%

+6.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

79.99%

49.11%

+30.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.09%

65.07%

+33.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.27%

62.52%

+23.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

121.94%

65.64%

+56.30%

Dividends

INUV vs. TGB - Dividend Comparison

Neither INUV nor TGB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

INUV vs. TGB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Inuvo, Inc. and Taseko Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
7.93M
234.55M
(INUV) Total Revenue
(TGB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

INUV vs. TGB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Inuvo, Inc. and Taseko Mines Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
46.2%
34.7%
Portfolio components
INUV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Inuvo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.66M and revenue of 7.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.2%.

TGB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 81.37M and revenue of 234.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.7%.

INUV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Inuvo, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.88M and revenue of 7.93M, resulting in an operating margin of -49.0%.

TGB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported an operating income of 66.76M and revenue of 234.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.5%.

INUV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Inuvo, Inc. reported a net income of 1.90M and revenue of 7.93M, resulting in a net margin of 23.9%.

TGB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported a net income of 16.89M and revenue of 234.55M, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


INUV and TGB have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INUV has higher volatility (29.34%) compared to TGB (22.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INUV dropped -99.77% vs TGB's -98.58%.

TGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INUV and TGB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer