INEQ vs. FNDF

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

INEQ (Columbia International Equity Income ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. INEQ is actively managed, while FNDF is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INEQ returned 9.64%/yr vs 11.48%/yr for FNDF. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. INEQ charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.

Performance

INEQ vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INEQ achieves a 7.17% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 16.98% return. Over the past 10 years, INEQ has underperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 9.64%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.48% annualized return.

INEQ

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: -0.20%
• 6M: 5.38%
• YTD: 7.17%
• 1Y: 22.36%
• 3Y*: 18.38%
• 5Y*: 12.12%
• 10Y*: 9.64%

FNDF

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -2.24%
• 6M: 12.91%
• YTD: 16.98%
• 1Y: 35.15%
• 3Y*: 20.92%
• 5Y*: 13.51%
• 10Y*: 11.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INEQ vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF	7.17%	39.85%	6.02%	20.88%	-5.95%	10.18%	-0.52%	15.83%	-18.30%	24.88%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	16.98%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	3.61%	18.46%	-14.21%	23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between INEQ and FNDF is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2016	0.83

The correlation between INEQ and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

INEQ vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INEQ	FNDF
Financial Services	23.2%	16.2%
Industrials	13.3%	15.5%
Energy	12.1%	10.9%
Healthcare	12.0%	5.2%
Basic Materials	11.4%	11.3%
Communication Services	7.8%	4.9%
Technology	5.6%	14.4%
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	10.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	6.5%
Utilities	2.8%	3.5%
Real Estate	1.7%	0.8%

Return for Risk

INEQ vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INEQ

INEQ Risk / Return Rank: 60
INEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
INEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
INEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 62
INEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
INEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 55

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 82
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INEQ vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INEQ	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	2.18	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	2.89	-0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.39	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	3.33	-0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.57	11.84	-4.27

INEQ vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INEQ and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INEQ vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INEQ drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, roughly equal to the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INEQ and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	INEQ	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.71%	-40.14%	-1.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.56%	-10.60%	+1.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.38%	-13.89%	-0.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.51%	-25.56%	+1.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.71%	-40.14%	-1.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.63%	-4.14%	+0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.03%	-7.61%	+0.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.96%	2.98%	-0.02%

Volatility

INEQ vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) is 3.93%, while Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that INEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INEQ	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.93%	5.58%	-1.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.35%	14.13%	-2.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.71%	16.23%	-2.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.32%	16.35%	-1.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.36%	17.41%	-1.05%

INEQ vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

INEQ has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

INEQ vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

INEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.74%, more than FNDF's 3.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	3.11%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF	9.74%	9.76%	3.11%	3.27%	3.57%	3.43%	2.64%	3.34%	7.25%	4.63%	2.52%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INEQ and FNDF in my portfolio?

INEQ and FNDF have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INEQ or FNDF?

FNDF has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to INEQ (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INEQ dropped -41.71% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which ETF is better, INEQ or FNDF?

On 10-year performance, FNDF leads with 11.48% vs 9.64% for INEQ. On fees, FNDF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, INEQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INEQ or FNDF?

Over the 10-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 11.48% return vs 9.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INEQ or FNDF?

FNDF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for INEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INEQ or FNDF?

INEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.74%, compared with 3.11% for FNDF.

What is the main difference between INEQ and FNDF?

They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for INEQ and 0.25% for FNDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.