INEQ vs. CRUX
INEQ (Columbia International Equity Income ETF) and CRUX (Columbia Core Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INEQ is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Columbia Threadneedle, while CRUX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Columbia Threadneedle. Both are actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INEQ charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for CRUX.
Performance
INEQ vs. CRUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
INEQ
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 8.09%
- 6M
- 11.60%
- 1Y
- 25.97%
- 3Y*
- 20.05%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- —
CRUX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INEQ vs. CRUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 3.75% |
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between INEQ and CRUX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2026 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INEQ vs. CRUX — Risk / Return Rank
INEQ
CRUX
INEQ vs. CRUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INEQ | CRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.69 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.64 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INEQ | CRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.03 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
INEQ vs. CRUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INEQ drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than CRUX's maximum drawdown of -1.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INEQ and CRUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INEQ | CRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.71% | -1.85% | -39.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -0.58% | -2.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -0.61% | -6.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | — | — |
Volatility
INEQ vs. CRUX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INEQ | CRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.48% | 4.35% | +9.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.29% | 4.35% | +10.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 4.35% | +11.96% |
INEQ vs. CRUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
INEQ has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CRUX's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
INEQ vs. CRUX - Dividend Comparison
INEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.13%, more than CRUX's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 9.13% | 9.76% | 3.11% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 3.43% | 2.64% | 3.34% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INEQ and CRUX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRUX is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRUX is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for INEQ.
INEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.13%, compared with 1.06% for CRUX.
INEQ is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CRUX is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for INEQ and 0.32% for CRUX.
Find the right allocation for INEQ and CRUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer