INEQ vs. CRUX
INEQ (Columbia International Equity Income ETF) and CRUX (Columbia Core Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INEQ is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Columbia Threadneedle, while CRUX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Columbia Threadneedle. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INEQ charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for CRUX.
Performance
INEQ vs. CRUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
INEQ
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- 5.17%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 23.37%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
CRUX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INEQ vs. CRUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 2.39% |
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 0.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between INEQ and CRUX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INEQ vs. CRUX — Risk / Return Rank
INEQ
CRUX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INEQ vs. CRUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INEQ | CRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.42 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INEQ vs. CRUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INEQ drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than CRUX's maximum drawdown of -1.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INEQ and CRUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INEQ | CRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.71% | -1.85% | -39.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.44% | -0.50% | -4.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.04% | -0.60% | -6.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | — | — |
Volatility
INEQ vs. CRUX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INEQ | CRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.77% | 4.10% | +9.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 4.10% | +11.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 4.10% | +12.24% |
INEQ vs. CRUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
INEQ has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CRUX's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
INEQ vs. CRUX - Dividend Comparison
INEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.38%, more than CRUX's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 9.38% | 9.76% | 3.11% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 3.43% | 2.64% | 3.34% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INEQ and CRUX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRUX is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRUX is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for INEQ.
INEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.38%, compared with 1.06% for CRUX.
INEQ is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CRUX is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for INEQ and 0.32% for CRUX.
Find the right allocation for INEQ and CRUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer