INEQ vs. FDT
INEQ (Columbia International Equity Income ETF) and FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. INEQ is actively managed, while FDT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, INEQ returned 11.72%/yr vs 12.55%/yr for FDT. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INEQ charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FDT.
Performance
INEQ vs. FDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INEQ achieves a 7.02% return, which is significantly lower than FDT's 25.50% return.
INEQ
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 7.02%
- 6M
- 10.22%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- —
FDT
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 25.50%
- 6M
- 28.63%
- 1Y
- 55.05%
- 3Y*
- 30.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
INEQ vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 7.02% | 39.85% | 6.02% | 20.88% | -5.95% | 10.18% | -0.52% | 15.83% | -18.30% | 24.88% |
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 25.50% | 52.21% | 6.97% | 15.03% | -19.51% | 11.43% | 4.29% | 16.82% | -19.98% | 34.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between INEQ and FDT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2016 | 0.78 |
The correlation between INEQ and FDT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
INEQ vs. FDT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INEQ
FDT
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Real Estate
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
INEQ
FDT
Energy
INEQ
FDT
Basic Materials
INEQ
FDT
Healthcare
INEQ
FDT
Utilities
INEQ
FDT
Consumer Defensive
INEQ
FDT
Technology
INEQ
FDT
Real Estate
INEQ
FDT
Communication Services
INEQ
FDT
Industrials
INEQ
FDT
Consumer Cyclical
INEQ
FDT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INEQ vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank
INEQ
FDT
INEQ vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INEQ | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.93 | 3.00 | -1.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.67 | 3.85 | -1.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.54 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 4.13 | -1.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.97 | 16.12 | -6.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INEQ | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 3.00 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.69 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.40 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
INEQ vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INEQ drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, smaller than the maximum FDT drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INEQ and FDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INEQ | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.71% | -46.10% | +4.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -13.41% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.38% | -14.29% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.51% | -33.18% | +8.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.77% | -1.59% | -2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -10.78% | +3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 3.43% | -0.84% |
Volatility
INEQ vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) is 3.92%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that INEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INEQ | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 7.23% | -3.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.62% | 15.91% | -5.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.48% | 18.42% | -4.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.30% | 18.23% | -2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 18.52% | -2.21% |
INEQ vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
INEQ has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
INEQ vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison
INEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.22%, more than FDT's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 2.84% | 3.27% | 3.89% | 4.36% | 2.29% | 3.80% | 2.42% | 2.78% | 2.13% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.83% |
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 9.22% | 9.76% | 3.11% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 3.43% | 2.64% | 3.34% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 2.52% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INEQ and FDT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDT has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to INEQ (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INEQ dropped -41.71% vs FDT's -46.10%.
On 5-year performance, FDT leads with 12.55% vs 11.72% for INEQ. On fees, INEQ is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, INEQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDT has performed better with a 12.55% return vs 11.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INEQ is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.
INEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.22%, compared with 2.84% for FDT.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for INEQ and 0.80% for FDT.
FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INEQ and FDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer