INEQ vs. CX
INEQ (Columbia International Equity Income ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Columbia Threadneedle, while CX (CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, INEQ returned 9.75%/yr vs 7.30%/yr for CX. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
INEQ vs. CX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INEQ achieves a 8.27% return, which is significantly lower than CX's 14.53% return. Over the past 10 years, INEQ has outperformed CX with an annualized return of 9.75%, while CX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.30% annualized return.
INEQ
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 6.84%
- YTD
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 25.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 12.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
CX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- 14.53%
- 1Y
- 79.32%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.30%
- 10Y*
- 7.30%
INEQ vs. CX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 8.27% | 39.85% | 6.02% | 20.88% | -5.95% | 10.18% | -0.52% | 15.83% | -18.30% | 24.88% |
CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. | 14.53% | 105.97% | -26.48% | 91.36% | -40.27% | 31.14% | 36.77% | -19.55% | -35.73% | -2.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between INEQ and CX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2016 | 0.44 |
The correlation between INEQ and CX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INEQ vs. CX — Risk / Return Rank
INEQ
CX
INEQ vs. CX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INEQ | CX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.36 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 3.32 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.47 | 11.07 | -2.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INEQ vs. CX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INEQ drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, smaller than the maximum CX drawdown of -92.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INEQ and CX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INEQ | CX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.71% | -92.37% | +50.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -23.99% | +14.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.38% | -44.38% | +30.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.51% | -62.57% | +38.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.71% | -83.70% | +41.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.65% | -37.06% | +34.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -51.12% | +44.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 7.19% | -4.22% |
Volatility
INEQ vs. CX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) is 3.47%, while CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that INEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INEQ | CX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 7.73% | -4.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.37% | 29.35% | -17.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.65% | 36.45% | -22.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.31% | 39.68% | -24.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 43.11% | -26.76% |
Dividends
INEQ vs. CX - Dividend Comparison
INEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.64%, more than CX's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. | 0.75% | 0.76% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 9.64% | 9.76% | 3.11% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 3.43% | 2.64% | 3.34% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INEQ and CX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CX has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to INEQ (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INEQ dropped -41.71% vs CX's -92.37%.
CX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INEQ and CX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer