PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INEQ vs. CX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INEQ vs. CX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INEQ achieves a 4.80% return, which is significantly lower than CX's 5.08% return. Over the past 10 years, INEQ has outperformed CX with an annualized return of 9.56%, while CX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.39% annualized return.


INEQ

1D
-0.35%
1M
-3.29%
YTD
4.80%
6M
5.07%
1Y
20.99%
3Y*
19.04%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*
9.56%

CX

1D
-1.15%
1M
-4.07%
YTD
5.08%
6M
1.98%
1Y
74.73%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
8.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INEQ vs. CX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INEQ
Columbia International Equity Income ETF
4.80%39.85%6.02%20.88%-5.95%10.18%-0.52%15.83%-18.30%24.88%
CX
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.
5.08%105.97%-26.48%91.36%-40.27%31.14%36.77%-19.55%-35.73%-2.86%

Correlation

The correlation between INEQ and CX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2016

0.44

The correlation between INEQ and CX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INEQ vs. CX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INEQ
INEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
INEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
INEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
INEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
INEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

CX
CX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INEQ vs. CX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INEQCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.34

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

3.13

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.50

10.90

-3.40

INEQ vs. CX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the CX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INEQ and CX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INEQ vs. CX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INEQ drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, smaller than the maximum CX drawdown of -92.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INEQ and CX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INEQCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.71%

-92.37%

+50.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-23.99%

+14.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.38%

-44.38%

+30.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.51%

-63.05%

+38.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.71%

-83.70%

+41.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.77%

-42.25%

+36.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.04%

-51.15%

+44.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

6.88%

-4.08%

Volatility

INEQ vs. CX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) is 3.95%, while CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) has a volatility of 11.90%. This indicates that INEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INEQCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

11.90%

-7.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.06%

29.92%

-18.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.78%

36.47%

-22.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.32%

39.75%

-24.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.34%

43.29%

-26.95%

Dividends

INEQ vs. CX - Dividend Comparison

INEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.27%, more than CX's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CX
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.
0.82%0.76%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INEQ
Columbia International Equity Income ETF
8.27%9.76%3.11%3.27%3.57%3.43%2.64%3.34%7.25%4.63%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


INEQ and CX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CX has higher volatility (11.90%) compared to INEQ (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INEQ dropped -41.71% vs CX's -92.37%.

CX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INEQ and CX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer