CX vs. CRH.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) and CRH plc (CRH.L).

Performance

CX vs. CRH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) and CRH plc (CRH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CX vs. CRH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.	1.08%	105.97%	-26.48%	91.36%	-40.27%	31.14%	36.77%	-19.55%	-35.73%	-2.86%
CRH.L CRH plc	-13.81%	38.93%	37.57%	79.60%	-22.23%	29.67%	6.75%	56.76%	-24.67%	4.93%

Different Trading Currencies

CX is traded in USD, while CRH.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CRH.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

EPS CX : $0.99 CRH.L : £9.89
PE Ratio CX : 11.76 CRH.L : 8.14
PEG Ratio CX : 0.03 CRH.L : 0.81
PS Ratio CX : 0.70 CRH.L : 0.81
Total Revenue (TTM) CX : $16.18B CRH.L : £67.44B
Gross Profit (TTM) CX : $5.08B CRH.L : £24.22B
EBITDA (TTM) CX : $1.73B CRH.L : £13.49B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CX achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly higher than CRH.L's -13.81% return. Over the past 10 years, CX has underperformed CRH.L with an annualized return of 6.13%, while CRH.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.27% annualized return.

CX

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: -4.41%
• YTD: 1.08%
• 6M: 30.90%
• 1Y: 105.30%
• 3Y*: 28.97%
• 5Y*: 11.61%
• 10Y*: 6.13%

CRH.L

• 1D: 4.05%
• 1M: -8.32%
• YTD: -13.81%
• 6M: -9.76%
• 1Y: 24.90%
• 3Y*: 31.97%
• 5Y*: 21.40%
• 10Y*: 17.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CX vs. CRH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CX

CX Risk / Return Rank: 94
CX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

CRH.L

CRH.L Risk / Return Rank: 61
CRH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
CRH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
CRH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 57
CRH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
CRH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CX vs. CRH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) and CRH plc (CRH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CX	CRH.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.01	0.77	+2.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.53	1.34	+2.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.16	+0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.53	0.96	+3.57
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.36	3.03	+14.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CX vs. CRH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CX Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is higher than the CRH.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CX and CRH.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CX	CRH.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.01	0.77	+2.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.71	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14	0.56	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.25	-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between CX and CRH.L is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CX vs. CRH.L - Dividend Comparison

CX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than CRH.L's 2.81% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.	0.77%	0.76%	1.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CRH.L CRH plc	2.81%	2.39%	1.89%	3.28%	2.78%	2.24%	2.34%	2.07%	2.88%	2.14%	1.93%	2.76%

Drawdowns

CX vs. CRH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CX drawdown since its inception was -92.37%, which is greater than CRH.L's maximum drawdown of -64.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CX and CRH.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CX	CRH.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.37%	-55.42%	-36.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.99%	-21.91%	-2.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.00%	-29.50%	-34.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.70%	-47.99%	-35.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.45%	-16.43%	-28.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.25%	-13.29%	-37.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.25%	7.48%	-1.23%

Volatility

CX vs. CRH.L - Volatility Comparison

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) has a higher volatility of 15.37% compared to CRH plc (CRH.L) at 10.98%. This indicates that CX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CX	CRH.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.37%	10.98%	+4.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.45%	20.37%	+7.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.25%	32.15%	+3.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.09%	29.99%	+10.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.37%	30.63%	+12.74%

Financials

CX vs. CRH.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and CRH plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a gross profit of 1.12B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.0%.

CRH.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CRH plc reported a gross profit of 3.46B and revenue of 11.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.2%.

CX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. reported an operating income of 491.35M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

CRH.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CRH plc reported an operating income of 660.63M and revenue of 11.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.8%.

CX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a net income of -355.93M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of -8.6%.

CRH.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CRH plc reported a net income of 536.76M and revenue of 11.46B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.