CX vs. HOLN.SW
Compare and contrast key facts about CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) and Holcim AG (HOLN.SW).
Performance
CX vs. HOLN.SW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CX vs. HOLN.SW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. | -0.23% | 105.97% | -26.48% | 91.36% | -40.27% | 31.14% | 36.77% | -19.55% | -35.73% | -2.86% |
HOLN.SW Holcim AG | -17.10% | 106.51% | 27.57% | 58.01% | 6.65% | -4.38% | 5.19% | 51.02% | -24.32% | 10.98% |
Different Trading Currencies
CX is traded in USD, while HOLN.SW is traded in CHF. To make them comparable, the HOLN.SW values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CX achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly higher than HOLN.SW's -17.10% return. Over the past 10 years, CX has underperformed HOLN.SW with an annualized return of 5.99%, while HOLN.SW has yielded a comparatively higher 18.31% annualized return.
CX
- 1D
- 6.82%
- 1M
- -8.36%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 27.77%
- 1Y
- 105.90%
- 3Y*
- 28.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.32%
- 10Y*
- 5.99%
HOLN.SW
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -11.68%
- YTD
- -17.10%
- 6M
- -3.74%
- 1Y
- 54.92%
- 3Y*
- 40.56%
- 5Y*
- 26.92%
- 10Y*
- 18.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CX vs. HOLN.SW — Risk / Return Rank
CX
HOLN.SW
CX vs. HOLN.SW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) and Holcim AG (HOLN.SW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CX | HOLN.SW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.02 | 1.64 | +1.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.55 | 2.34 | +1.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.33 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.34 | 1.74 | +2.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.76 | 5.99 | +10.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CX | HOLN.SW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.02 | 1.64 | +1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 1.05 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 | 0.70 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.22 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between CX and HOLN.SW is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CX vs. HOLN.SW - Dividend Comparison
CX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than HOLN.SW's 2.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. | 0.78% | 0.76% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HOLN.SW Holcim AG | 2.43% | 2.03% | 3.21% | 3.79% | 4.59% | 4.30% | 4.11% | 11.05% | 4.94% | 3.64% | 2.80% | 7.43% |
Drawdowns
CX vs. HOLN.SW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CX drawdown since its inception was -92.37%, which is greater than HOLN.SW's maximum drawdown of -75.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CX and HOLN.SW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CX | HOLN.SW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.37% | -76.45% | -15.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.99% | -24.70% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.00% | -27.64% | -36.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.70% | -46.18% | -37.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.17% | -20.93% | -24.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.25% | -23.78% | -27.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.21% | 7.72% | -1.51% |
Volatility
CX vs. HOLN.SW - Volatility Comparison
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) has a higher volatility of 16.60% compared to Holcim AG (HOLN.SW) at 9.24%. This indicates that CX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HOLN.SW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CX | HOLN.SW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.60% | 9.24% | +7.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.44% | 22.13% | +5.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.25% | 34.06% | +1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.10% | 25.74% | +14.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.38% | 26.41% | +16.97% |
Financials
CX vs. HOLN.SW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and Holcim AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities