CX vs. EMSA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) and iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMSA.L).
EMSA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. It was launched on Sep 24, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CX or EMSA.L.
Key characteristics
| CX | EMSA.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.06% | 1.78% |
| 1Y Return | 19.67% | 9.57% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -1.75% | -3.16% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 13.15% | 0.26% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.60 | 1.12 |
| Daily Std Dev | 33.88% | 8.57% |
| Max Drawdown | -93.80% | -29.12% |
| Current Drawdown | -69.89% | -12.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between CX and EMSA.L is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CX vs. EMSA.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CX achieves a 2.06% return, which is significantly higher than EMSA.L's 1.78% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CX vs. EMSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) and iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CX vs. EMSA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CX nor EMSA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.58% |
EMSA.L iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CX vs. EMSA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CX drawdown since its inception was -93.80%, which is greater than EMSA.L's maximum drawdown of -29.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CX and EMSA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CX vs. EMSA.L - Volatility Comparison
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMSA.L) at 2.01%. This indicates that CX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMSA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.