CX vs. USLM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) and United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM).

Performance

CX vs. USLM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) and United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CX vs. USLM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.	-0.23%	105.97%	-26.48%	91.36%	-40.27%	31.14%	36.77%	-19.55%	-35.73%	-2.86%
USLM United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.	9.14%	-9.59%	188.91%	64.34%	9.84%	13.69%	27.15%	35.03%	-7.26%	2.47%

Fundamentals

EPS CX : $0.99 USLM : $4.67
PE Ratio CX : 11.60 USLM : 27.95
PEG Ratio CX : 0.03 USLM : 0.72
PS Ratio CX : 0.69 USLM : 10.07
Total Revenue (TTM) CX : $16.18B USLM : $372.73M
Gross Profit (TTM) CX : $5.08B USLM : $182.31M
EBITDA (TTM) CX : $1.73B USLM : $186.33M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CX achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than USLM's 9.14% return. Over the past 10 years, CX has underperformed USLM with an annualized return of 5.99%, while USLM has yielded a comparatively higher 28.74% annualized return.

CX

• 1D: 6.82%
• 1M: -8.36%
• YTD: -0.23%
• 6M: 27.77%
• 1Y: 105.90%
• 3Y*: 28.41%
• 5Y*: 11.32%
• 10Y*: 5.99%

USLM

• 1D: 4.31%
• 1M: 14.41%
• YTD: 9.14%
• 6M: -0.61%
• 1Y: 48.10%
• 3Y*: 62.78%
• 5Y*: 37.32%
• 10Y*: 28.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CX vs. USLM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CX

CX Risk / Return Rank: 95
CX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

USLM

USLM Risk / Return Rank: 77
USLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
USLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
USLM Omega Ratio Rank: 73
USLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
USLM Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CX vs. USLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) and United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CX	USLM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.02	1.26	+1.76
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.55	1.84	+1.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.23	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.34	2.09	+2.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.76	5.65	+11.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CX vs. USLM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CX Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is higher than the USLM Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CX and USLM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CX	USLM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.02	1.26	+1.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	1.08	-0.79
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14	0.80	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.26	-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between CX and USLM is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CX vs. USLM - Dividend Comparison

CX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than USLM's 0.18% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.	0.78%	0.76%	1.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USLM United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.	0.18%	0.20%	0.15%	0.35%	0.57%	0.50%	0.56%	6.52%	0.76%	0.70%	0.66%	0.91%

Drawdowns

CX vs. USLM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CX drawdown since its inception was -92.37%, which is greater than USLM's maximum drawdown of -77.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CX and USLM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CX	USLM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.37%	-77.09%	-15.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.99%	-22.46%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.00%	-45.87%	-18.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.70%	-45.87%	-37.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.17%	-16.82%	-28.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.25%	-27.37%	-23.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.21%	8.31%	-2.10%

Volatility

CX vs. USLM - Volatility Comparison

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) has a higher volatility of 16.60% compared to United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM) at 12.29%. This indicates that CX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CX	USLM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.60%	12.29%	+4.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.44%	26.53%	+0.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.25%	38.41%	-3.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.10%	34.91%	+5.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.38%	35.88%	+7.50%

Financials

CX vs. USLM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a gross profit of 1.12B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.0%.

USLM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 42.18M and revenue of 87.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.0%.

CX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. reported an operating income of 491.35M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

USLM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. reported an operating income of 36.01M and revenue of 87.94M, resulting in an operating margin of 41.0%.

CX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a net income of -355.93M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of -8.6%.

USLM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. reported a net income of 30.55M and revenue of 87.94M, resulting in a net margin of 34.7%.