CX vs. USLM
CX (CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.) and USLM (United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Building Materials industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, CX returned 5.82%/yr vs 25.55%/yr for USLM. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CX vs. USLM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CX achieves a 3.34% return, which is significantly higher than USLM's -7.78% return. Over the past 10 years, CX has underperformed USLM with an annualized return of 5.82%, while USLM has yielded a comparatively higher 25.55% annualized return.
CX
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -3.82%
- 6M
- -4.86%
- YTD
- 3.34%
- 1Y
- 41.96%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 5.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.56%
USLM
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- 6M
- -8.38%
- YTD
- -7.78%
- 1Y
- 11.63%
- 3Y*
- 39.62%
- 5Y*
- 32.25%
- 10Y*
- 25.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $88.98M | $77.81M | $66.72M | |
| $22.06M | $19.99M | $23.66M |
CX vs. USLM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. | 3.34% | 105.97% | -26.48% | 91.36% | -40.27% | 31.14% | 36.77% | -19.55% | -35.73% | -2.86% |
USLM United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. | -7.78% | -9.59% | 188.91% | 64.34% | 9.84% | 13.69% | 27.15% | 35.03% | -7.26% | 2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between CX and USLM is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 1999 | 0.23 |
The correlation between CX and USLM shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CX:
$17.15B
USLM:
$3.16B
CX:
$1.01
USLM:
$4.67
CX:
11.69
USLM:
23.60
CX:
0.03
USLM:
0.61
CX:
0.33
USLM:
8.42
CX:
0.14
USLM:
4.56
CX:
$17.00B
USLM:
$376.92M
CX:
$5.72B
USLM:
$182.67M
CX:
$2.78B
USLM:
$188.40M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CX vs. USLM — Risk / Return Rank
CX
USLM
CX vs. USLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) and United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CX | USLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.08 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 0.37 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 0.78 | +4.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CX vs. USLM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CX drawdown since its inception was -92.37%, which is greater than USLM's maximum drawdown of -77.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CX and USLM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CX | USLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.37% | -77.09% | -15.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.99% | -30.06% | +6.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.38% | -45.87% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.21% | -45.87% | -15.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.70% | -45.87% | -37.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.21% | -29.71% | -13.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.11% | -27.37% | -23.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.47% | 14.14% | -6.67% |
Volatility
CX vs. USLM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) is 8.55%, while United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM) has a volatility of 11.03%. This indicates that CX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CX | USLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.55% | 11.03% | -2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.65% | 33.17% | -3.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.40% | 41.49% | -5.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.54% | 36.36% | +3.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.06% | 36.59% | +6.47% |
Dividends
CX vs. USLM - Dividend Comparison
CX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than USLM's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. | 0.83% | 0.76% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USLM United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.15% | 0.35% | 0.57% | 0.50% | 0.56% | 6.52% | 0.76% | 0.70% | 0.66% | 0.91% |
Financials
CX vs. USLM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CX vs. USLM - Profitability Comparison
CX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a gross profit of 1.62B and revenue of 4.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.2%.
USLM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.72M and revenue of 99.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.1%.
CX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. reported an operating income of 680.64M and revenue of 4.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.8%.
USLM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. reported an operating income of 40.66M and revenue of 99.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 41.0%.
CX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a net income of 346.64M and revenue of 4.59B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
USLM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. reported a net income of 34.51M and revenue of 99.13M, resulting in a net margin of 34.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CX and USLM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USLM has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to CX (8.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CX dropped -92.37% vs USLM's -77.09%.
CX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CX and USLM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer