INDQ vs. ICOW
INDQ (Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF) and ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INDQ is a India Equities fund actively managed by Pacer, while ICOW is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. INDQ is actively managed, while ICOW is passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INDQ charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ICOW.
Performance
INDQ vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
INDQ
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ICOW
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- 6M
- 8.47%
- YTD
- 10.30%
- 1Y
- 28.58%
- 3Y*
- 16.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.77%
- 10Y*
- —
INDQ vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
INDQ Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF | 3.17% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDQ and ICOW is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDQ vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank
INDQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ICOW
INDQ vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF (INDQ) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INDQ | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.22 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INDQ vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDQ drawdown since its inception was -6.55%, smaller than the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDQ and ICOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDQ | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.55% | -43.49% | +36.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.09% | -6.61% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -7.57% | +4.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.86% | — |
Volatility
INDQ vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDQ | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.86% | 14.86% | +5.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 16.78% | +3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 18.49% | +1.37% |
INDQ vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDQ has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDQ vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison
INDQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.31% | 3.03% | 4.39% | 3.61% | 5.26% | 2.11% | 2.46% | 3.10% | 2.61% | 0.80% |
INDQ Pacer ActiveAlpha India Quality ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDQ and ICOW have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICOW is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICOW is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for INDQ.
ICOW has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.00% for INDQ.
INDQ is categorized as India Equities, while ICOW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for INDQ and 0.65% for ICOW.
Find the right allocation for INDQ and ICOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer